ROS-assay interference controls
Biochemical assay · Cell-free ROS detection systems, including NOX-free MCLA auto-oxidation and peroxidase/Amplex Red controls [1]
At 100 μM, GKT137831 altered ROS-detection signals in NOX-free controls. This limits target attribution from these assays; it does not establish absence of all NOX binding.
| Endpoint | Reported result | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| MCLA auto-oxidation and peroxidase/Amplex Red readouts without NOX | qualitative response Substantial interference in both assays | [1] |
| Xanthine oxidase-coupled peroxide signal versus PMS-NADH superoxide assay | qualitative response Strong reduction of the peroxide-coupled signal; no significant superoxide-scavenging effect attributed to GKT137831 | [1] |
Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions
- Treatment concentration
- 100 μM
- Method
- Cell-free assay-interference and ROS-scavenging comparison
- Co-treatment
- No therapeutic combination
- Reported limits
- Exact Figure 4B incubation details and replicate n are not specified in the reviewed main-text description; no percentage was digitized.
Methods and source locations
Compound reported in the paper: GKT137831; Compound label in the paper: GKT137831
Reported effects apply to the experimental material and model; they do not validate an Adooq lot.
Figures 1A and 4A–B; §§2.1, 2.4, 2.10, 3.3
MCLA auto-oxidation and peroxidase/Amplex Red readouts without NOX: NOX-free probe controls, including NADPH in the peroxidase/Amplex Red control — Figure 4B; §3.3
Xanthine oxidase-coupled peroxide signal versus PMS-NADH superoxide assay: Parallel cell-free detection systems; superoxide assay used SOD as positive control — Figure 4A; §§2.4 and 3.3