EGF-stimulated signaling in head-and-neck carcinoma cells
Cell-based study · FaDu, UT-SCC-8 and UT-SCC-42a human squamous carcinoma cells [1]
Dacomitinib reduced EGF-stimulated EGFR phosphorylation and downstream ERK, AKT and mTOR phosphorylation. STAT3 behaved differently, with rebound at higher concentrations. These are cellular signaling endpoints, not purified-enzyme inhibition constants.
| Endpoint | Reported result | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| EGFR phosphorylation relative to untreated control | Cellular phosphorylation IC50 FaDu: 100 nM; UT-SCC-8: 50 nM; UT-SCC-42a: 100 nM | [1] |
| STAT3 phosphorylation | Qualitative response Reduced at 10 nM; induced above untreated levels at higher concentrations | [1] |
Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions
- Treatment concentration
- 0, 10, 50, 100, 250 or 500 nM
- Exposure duration
- 24 h; EGF (20 ng/mL) added during the final 30 min
- Method
- Serum-free exposure followed by Western blotting; phosphorylated and total proteins assessed with β-actin control.
- Vehicle
- DMSO; shared in-vitro negative control specified as 0.01% DMSO.
- Co-treatment
- EGF stimulation; no radiation in this signaling experiment.
- Reported limits
- No exact solid form or lot analytical data. Figure S3 normalization described without numerical underlying densitometry table.
Methods and source locations
Compound reported in the paper: Dacomitinib; Compound label in the paper: PF-00299804
Compound-level published research; no validation of the current A11051 lot or exact solid form.
Figure 4; Results: Dacomitinib inhibited EGFR signalling; Methods: Western Blot Analysis; File S1 Figure S3
EGFR phosphorylation relative to untreated control: Reported densitometry estimates; File S1 S3 normalizes signals to β-actin and phosphorylated/total protein ratios. Representative blots from three independent experiments. — Results: Dacomitinib inhibited EGFR signalling; Figure 4; File S1 Figure S3 and caption
STAT3 phosphorylation: Western blot; representative results from three independent experiments. No exact fold change inferred from image. — Figure 4 and corresponding Results paragraph