Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Dinaciclib (SCH 727965)

CDK Inhibitor

Dinaciclib (SCH 727965) is a potent and selective cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, selectively inhibiting CDK1, CDK2, CDK5 and CDK9 with IC50 values of 3, 1, 1 and 4 nM respectively.

In Stock

Publications for Dinaciclib

5 publications citing this product

  1. Vineeta Teotia, .et al. , ACS Omega, 2024, Sep 13;9(38):39873-39892 PMID: 39346877
  2. Vijaya Bharti, .et al. , Cell Rep, 2022, Dec 20;41(12):111826 PMID: 36543138
  3. Sepideh Izadi, .et al. , Pharm Res, 2020, Sep 17;37(10):196 PMID: 32944844
  4. Shahin Hallaj, .et al. , Life Sci, 2020, Jul 26 PMID: 32726663
  5. Washio I, .et al. , Drug Metab Dispos, 2018, Mar;46(3):214-222 PMID: 29246888

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

Dinaciclib inhibited CDK1 in a cell-free ADP-Glo assay. The authors reported complete inhibition at 1, 10 and 100 μM; this fixed-concentration experiment does not define an IC50 or establish subtype selectivity. [1]

In NGP, SH-SY5Y and SK-N-AS neuroblastoma cells, dinaciclib reduced Rb Ser807/811 and RNA polymerase II Ser2 phosphorylation. These substrate readouts are consistent with CDK2/CDK9 pathway inhibition, without proving that those targets alone account for the cellular response. [2]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
CDK2 (Cell-free assay) 1 nM
CDK5 (Cell-free assay) 1 nM
CDK1 (Cell-free assay) 3 nM
CDK9 (Cell-free assay) 4 nM

Cellular Effect

Cell Line Activity Value Description Reference
A-375 GI50 0.011 μM Antiproliferative activity against human A375 cells after 72 hrs by Celltiter-Glo assay [PMID: 30253346]
A-431 GI50 0.011 μM Antiproliferative activity against human A431 cells after 72 hrs by Celltiter-Glo assay [PMID: 30253346]
A673 IC50 < 0.005 μM Cytotoxicity against human A673 cells after 72 hrs by resazurin/resorufin-based fluorescence assay [PMID: 23600925]
A673 EC50 0.011 μM Induction of apoptosis in human A673 cells assessed as caspase-3 activation after 24 hrs by luminescence assay [PMID: 23600925]
BT-549 IC50 > 10 μM Cytotoxicity against human BT549 cells after 72 hrs by resazurin/resorufin-based fluorescence assay [PMID: 23600925]
CCRF-CEM IC50 0.007 μM Antiproliferative activity against human CEM cells assessed as growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by calcein AM dye-based fluorescence assay [PMID: 30943029]
CHO GI50 0.16 μM Antiproliferative activity against CHO cells after 72 hrs by Celltiter-Glo assay [PMID: 30253346]
COLO 205 GI50 0.0068 μM Antiproliferative activity against human COLO205 cells after 72 hrs by Celltiter-Glo assay [PMID: 30253346]
DB GI50 0.014 μM Antiproliferative activity against human DB cells assessed as cell growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by resazurin dye based microplate reader analysis [PMID: 35749742]
G-361 IC50 0.016 μM Antiproliferative activity against human G361 cells assessed as growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by calcein AM dye-based fluorescence assay [PMID: 30943029]
GISTT1 GI50 0.0088 μM Antiproliferative activity against human GISTT1 cells after 72 hrs by Celltiter-Glo assay [PMID: 30253346]
HCT-116 IC50 0.007 μM Antiproliferative activity against human HCT116 cells assessed as growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by calcein AM dye-based fluorescence assay [PMID: 30943029]
HEK-293T IC50 0.023 μM Antiproliferative activity against human HEK293T cells assessed as cell growth inhibition incubated for 48 hrs [PMID: 35143203]
HeLa IC50 0.013 μM Antiproliferative activity against human HeLa cells assessed as growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by calcein AM dye-based fluorescence assay [PMID: 30943029]
HL-60 GI50 0.008 μM Antiproliferative activity against human HL60 cells after 72 hrs by Celltiter-Glo assay [PMID: 30253346]
HOS-TE85 IC50 0.0055 μM Cytotoxicity against human MNNG-HOS cells after 72 hrs by resazurin/resorufin-based fluorescence assay [PMID: 23600925]
HT GI50 0.019 μM Antiproliferative activity against human HT cells measured after 72 hrs by calcein AM dye-based fluorescence assay [PMID: 30943029]
HT IC50 0.019 μM Antiproliferative activity against human HT cells assessed as growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by calcein AM dye-based fluorescence assay [PMID: 30943029]
JeKo-1 IC50 0.014 μM Antiproliferative activity against human JeKo1 cells assessed as growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by calcein AM dye-based fluorescence assay [PMID: 30943029]

19 records · Scroll to view more

In Vitro Studies

The discovery study reported an A2780 thymidine-uptake growth-inhibition IC50 of 0.004 μM for compound 13 (SCH 727965), relative to vehicle controls. [3]

Across the 23-line pediatric panel, 96 h exposure gave a median absolute IC50 of 7.5 nM (range 3.4–11.2 nM). Most lines showed a cytotoxic response pattern, but selected neuroblastoma lines showed increased survival at high concentrations relative to their response minima. [4]

CDK1 enzyme assay using dinaciclib as a reference inhibitor

Biochemical assay · CDK1 protein with histone H1 substrate; ADP-Glo luminescence assay [1]

The authors described complete CDK1 inhibition by dinaciclib at the three tested reference-compound concentrations. This fixed-concentration result does not establish a dinaciclib IC50 or CDK subtype selectivity.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
CDK1 activity relative to enzyme controlReported qualitative inhibition Complete inhibition at 1, 10 and 100 μM[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
1, 10 and 100 μM
Exposure duration
60 min kinase reaction
Method
Cell-free CDK1 kinase assay
Co-treatment
None
Reported limits
Dinaciclib salt, explicit stereochemical characterization, lot and replicate count are not given in the read main-text assay description. Table S8 not retrieved.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Dinaciclib (SCH 727965)

Compound-level research evidence; tested supplier/form and model conditions apply. No Adooq lot validation or clinical efficacy inference.

Sections 2.10 (Kinase Assay) and 3.7 (Kinase Assay results)

CDK1 activity relative to enzyme control: ADP-Glo assay; 1 ng CDK1, histone H1 0.2 μg/μL, ATP 50 μM; enzyme control without compound and no-enzyme control; RO-3306 reference comparator. — Sections 2.10 (Kinase Assay) and 3.7 (Kinase Assay results)

A2780 growth inhibition by compound 13

Cell-based study · A2780 human ovarian carcinoma cells [3]

Table 2 reports an in-cell IC50 of 0.004 μM for compound 13, identified as SCH 727965. The endpoint is thymidine uptake growth inhibition relative to vehicle controls.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
A2780 thymidine uptake growth inhibitionIC50 0.004 μM[3]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Dose-response assay; tested concentration range not specified in the read main text
Method
Thymidine uptake growth inhibition
Vehicle
Vehicle controls; composition not specified in the read main text
Co-treatment
None
Reported limits
Exposure duration, cell assay replication and vehicle composition not stated in the read main text; cited earlier assay methods were not acquired.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Dinaciclib (SCH 727965); Compound label in the paper: Compound 13

Compound-level research evidence; tested supplier/form and model conditions apply. No Adooq lot validation or clinical efficacy inference.

Table 2, compound 13, In-Cell IC50 column and footnote b; concluding paragraph identifying compound 13 as SCH 727965

A2780 thymidine uptake growth inhibition: Thymidine uptake assay; inhibition calculated relative to vehicle controls and plotted on log-linear plots to derive IC50 (Table 2 footnote b). — Table 2, compound 13, In-Cell IC50 column and footnote b; concluding paragraph identifying compound 13 as SCH 727965

Pediatric cell-line viability panel and nonmonotonic responses

Cell-based study · PPTP panel of 23 pediatric cancer cell lines [4]

After 96 h, the panel median absolute IC50 was 7.5 nM (range 3.4–11.2 nM). Most lines showed a cytotoxic activity pattern. Selected neuroblastoma lines had higher survival at high concentrations than near the minimum of their response curves.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Cell survival reduced to 50% of control (absolute IC50)Absolute IC50 Median 7.5 nM; minimum 3.4 nM; maximum 11.2 nM[4]
Higher T/C% at 1 μM than at 30 nM in NB-EBc1 and CHLA-136Reported concentration comparison p<.0001 and p=0.0002, respectively[4]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
0.1 nM to 1 μM
Exposure duration
96 h
Method
DIMSCAN viable-cell assay
Co-treatment
None
Reported limits
In vitro vehicle composition and replicate numbers are not specified in the acquired main-text description.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Dinaciclib (SCH 727965)

Compound-level research evidence; tested supplier/form and model conditions apply. No Adooq lot validation or clinical efficacy inference.

Materials and Methods: In vitro testing; Results: In vitro testing; Table I; Figure 1B and caption

Cell survival reduced to 50% of control (absolute IC50): DIMSCAN fluorescence-based viable-cell quantification after 96 h. These are absolute IC50 values, not the separate relative IC50 column. — Table I; Methods: In vitro testing

Higher T/C% at 1 μM than at 30 nM in NB-EBc1 and CHLA-136: DIMSCAN; qualitative curve direction verified in original Figure 1B. No survival percentages estimated from curves. — Figure 1B and caption; Results: In vitro testing

Neuroblastoma phosphorylation responses consistent with CDK2/CDK9 inhibition

Cell-based study · NGP, SH-SY5Y and SK-N-AS human neuroblastoma cells [2]

Dinaciclib reduced Rb Ser807/811 and RNA polymerase II Ser2 phosphorylation in time- and concentration-dependent experiments. These cellular substrate readouts support pathway inhibition but do not independently establish exclusive CDK2/CDK9 causation.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Rb Ser807/811 and RNA polymerase II Ser2 phosphorylationQualitative immunoblot response Decreased phosphorylation with increasing exposure time or concentration[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Time course: 0.2 μM; 4 h concentration series: 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1 μM
Exposure duration
Time course: 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h; concentration series: 4 h
Method
Immunoblotting
Co-treatment
None
Reported limits
Specific solvent matching for Figure 3c,d and independent replicate count are not specified in the read caption/methods.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Dinaciclib (SCH 727965)

Compound-level research evidence; tested supplier/form and model conditions apply. No Adooq lot validation or clinical efficacy inference.

Results: Dinaciclib abrogates CDK2 and CDK9 activity; Figure 3c,d and caption; Methods: Reagents, Cell Culture, Immunoblotting

Rb Ser807/811 and RNA polymerase II Ser2 phosphorylation: Immunoblots with total Rb and total RNA polymerase II comparators and β-actin loading control; zero-time/zero-dose controls shown. No fold change or IC50 calculated. — Figure 3c,d; corresponding Results and caption

In Vivo Studies

In the pediatric xenograft panel, intermittent dinaciclib delayed EFS in 23/36 evaluable solid-tumor models and 3/7 ALL models. No solid-tumor objective responses occurred; two ALL models responded. ALL-4 and ALL-8 instead showed significantly shorter EFS distributions, underscoring model-dependent activity. [4]

In a separate orthotopic study, 20 mg/kg dinaciclib given intraperitoneally once daily for 21 days reduced terminal tumor weights in NGP and SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma models versus DMSO controls (N=4 per group per model). The different models, schedules and endpoints limit direct comparison with the pediatric panel. [2]

Pediatric xenograft panel: growth delay with limited objective responses

Animal study · Pediatric solid-tumor and ALL xenografts in female immunodeficient mice [4]

Dinaciclib delayed EFS in many models but produced no objective responses in the solid-tumor panel. ALL-16 showed a partial response and ALL-17 a complete response. Table II also shows significantly shorter EFS distributions for ALL-4 and ALL-8; response was not uniformly beneficial.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
EFS delay and objective response across xenograftsModel counts EFS delay: 23/36 solid-tumor models and 3/7 ALL models; solid-tumor objective responses: none; ALL objective responses: 2[4]
EFS differences in models with EFS T/C below 1EFS T/C; EFS p-value ALL-4: 0.8; p=0.029. ALL-8: 0.9; p=0.023.[4]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Intraperitoneal injection
Frequency
Twice weekly for 2 weeks; repeated at Day 21
Treatment course
Total observation period 6 weeks
Vehicle
20% hydroxy-propyl-β-cyclodextrin in sterile water
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
Dinaciclib monotherapy versus concurrent control
40 mg/kg
Concurrent controls; 10 mice per solid-tumor group or eight per leukemia group.Significant EFS delay in 23/36 evaluable solid-tumor models and 3/7 ALL models; no solid-tumor objective responses; ALL-16 partial response and ALL-17 complete response. ALL-4 and ALL-8 had EFS T/C<1 with significant distribution differences.[4]
Dinaciclib monotherapy versus concurrent control
Model: 43 pediatric xenograft models (solid tumors and ALL) in female immunodeficient mice
Reported limits: Exact dosing days and long-course control administration details are not specified in the acquired main text.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Dinaciclib (SCH 727965)

Compound-level research evidence; tested supplier/form and model conditions apply. No Adooq lot validation or clinical efficacy inference.

Methods: in vivo studies, response definitions, statistics, formulation; Results: In vivo testing; Table II; Figure 2 and caption

EFS delay and objective response across xenografts: Two-sided exact log-rank tests for EFS; p-values not adjusted for multiple comparisons. EFS events: fourfold tumor-volume increase or >25% hCD45-positive peripheral blood leukocytes. — Results: In vivo testing; Table II; Figure 2

EFS differences in models with EFS T/C below 1: Exact log-rank comparison versus concurrent controls; these significant differences are adverse in direction, not beneficial delays. — Table II, ALL-4 and ALL-8 rows and footnote

Dinaciclib monotherapy versus concurrent control · Methods: in vivo studies, response definitions, statistics, formulation; Results: In vivo testing; Table II; Figure 2 and caption

Orthotopic neuroblastoma tumor-weight response

Animal study · NGP and SH-SY5Y orthotopic xenografts in athymic NCR nude mice [2]

Once-daily dinaciclib for 21 days reduced final tumor weights in both orthotopic neuroblastoma models versus DMSO controls (four mice per group per model). This endpoint does not establish survival benefit or a directly comparable response rate to the PPTP panel.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Terminal tumor weight versus DMSO controlTwo-tailed Student’s t-test NGP: p<0.05; SH-SY5Y: p<0.001; N=4 per group for each model[2]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Intraperitoneal injection
Frequency
Once daily
Treatment course
21 days
Vehicle
DMSO carrier; full injected formulation not specified
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
Dinaciclib monotherapy versus concurrent control
20 mg/kg
Equal-volume DMSO control; four mice per group for each model; groups randomized after tumor assessment.Lower terminal tumor weights versus DMSO controls: NGP p<0.05; SH-SY5Y p<0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t-test).[2]
Dinaciclib monotherapy versus concurrent control
Model: NGP- and SH-SY5Y-derived orthotopic neuroblastoma xenografts in athymic NCR nude mice; N=4 per group for each cell line
Reported limits: Mouse sex/age and complete injected formulation are not specified in the read orthotopic methods; no survival endpoint or numerical effect size adopted.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Dinaciclib (SCH 727965)

Compound-level research evidence; tested supplier/form and model conditions apply. No Adooq lot validation or clinical efficacy inference.

Figure 5a–d and caption; orthotopic xenograft Results; Methods: Antitumor Efficacy in Orthotopic Mouse Models

Terminal tumor weight versus DMSO control: Tumors harvested and weighed at treatment completion. Original scatter plots viewed; no exact gram weights or percentage inhibition inferred. — Figure 5c,d and caption

Dinaciclib monotherapy versus concurrent control · Figure 5a–d and caption; orthotopic xenograft Results; Methods: Antitumor Efficacy in Orthotopic Mouse Models

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
Actions Inhibitor
CAS Number 779353-01-4
Applications CDK Inhibitor
Formula C21H28N6O2
Molecular Weight 396.5
Synonyms SCH727965
SMILES
CCC1=C2N=C(C=C(N2N=C1)NCC3=C[N+](=CC=C3)[O-])N4CCCC[C@H]4CCO

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO Warmed: 22 mg/mL (55.48 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol Warmed: 7 mg/mL (17.65 mM)

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

In Vivo Preparation

Concentration
9 mg/mL
Vehicle
2% DMSO+30% PEG 300+ddH2O

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Teotia V, Jha P, Chopra M. Discovery of Potential Inhibitors of CDK1 by Integrating Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening, Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies, and Evaluation of Their Inhibitory Activity. ACS Omega (2024). PMID: 39346877 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c05414 Source material
  2. [2] Chen Z, Wang Z, Pang JC, et al. Multiple CDK inhibitor dinaciclib suppresses neuroblastoma growth via inhibiting CDK2 and CDK9 activity. Sci Rep (2016). PMID: 27378523 DOI: 10.1038/srep29090 Source material
  3. [3] Paruch K, Dwyer MP, Alvarez C, et al. Discovery of Dinaciclib (SCH 727965): A Potent and Selective Inhibitor of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases. ACS Med Chem Lett (2010). PMID: 24900195 DOI: 10.1021/ml100051d Source material
  4. [4] Gorlick R, Kolb EA, Houghton PJ, et al. Initial testing (stage 1) of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor SCH 727965 (dinaciclib) by the pediatric preclinical testing program. Pediatr Blood Cancer (2012). PMID: 22315240 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24073 Source material

Publications

5 publications citing this product

  1. Vineeta Teotia, .et al. , ACS Omega, 2024, Sep 13;9(38):39873-39892 PMID: 39346877
  2. Vijaya Bharti, .et al. , Cell Rep, 2022, Dec 20;41(12):111826 PMID: 36543138
  3. Sepideh Izadi, .et al. , Pharm Res, 2020, Sep 17;37(10):196 PMID: 32944844
  4. Shahin Hallaj, .et al. , Life Sci, 2020, Jul 26 PMID: 32726663
  5. Washio I, .et al. , Drug Metab Dispos, 2018, Mar;46(3):214-222 PMID: 29246888

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...