Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Everolimus (RAD001)

Cat. No. A10374 CAS 159351-69-6

mTOR inhibitor

Everolimus (RAD-001) is the 40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl) derivative of sirolimus and works similarly to sirolimus as an mTOR inhibitor.

In Stock

Publications for Everolimus

10 publications citing this product

  1. Majid Momeny, .et al. , EMBO Mol Med, 2024, Jun 17 PMID: 38886591
  2. Ming-Chun Hung, .et al. , Cell Biosci, 2022, 12: 122 PMID: 35918763
  3. Yusuke Murase, .et al. , Oncol Rep, 2022, Apr;47(4):61 PMID: 35088890
  4. Gabriela Torres-Flores, .et al. , Adv Polym Technol, 2020, ID 5462949
  5. Takaaki Fujimura, .et al. , Cancer Biol Ther, 2020, Sep 1;21(9):863-870 PMID: 32835580
  6. BD Henriksbo, .et al. , Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2020, Jul 1;319(1):E110-E116 PMID: 32421368
  7. Hiroshi Fukamachi, .et al. , J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2019, 38:127 PMID: 30866995
  8. Nachi Namatame, .et al. , Oncotarget, 2018, Oct 12; 9(80): 35141-35161 PMID: 30416685
  9. Hirosumi Tamura, .et al. , Oncol Rep, 2018, Aug; 40(2): 635-646 PMID: 29917168
  10. Rieko Ohki, .et al. , Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014, 111(23): E2404-E2413 PMID: 24912192

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

Everolimus (RAD001) inhibits mTOR-pathway output. In NCI-H446 cells, 24-h RAD001 treatment reduced P70S6K Thr389 phosphorylation, while 4EBP1 phosphorylation persisted and AKT phosphorylation increased. These cellular readouts show incomplete pathway suppression; they do not measure binding affinity. [1]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
mTOR (FKBP12) (Cell-free assay) 1.6 nM-2.4 nM

Cellular Effect

Cell Line Activity Value Description Reference
CAKI-1 IC50 14 μM Cytotoxicity against human Caki1 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 24445311]
COLO 205 IC50 20 μM Cytotoxicity against human COLO205 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 24445311]
Cortical neurone IC50 150 pM Inhibition of oversizing of mouse primary cortical neuron harboring TSC1 deletion mutant at 20 nM incubated for 7 days by immunofluorescence assay [PMID: 31955578]
DU-145 IC50 8 μM Cytotoxicity against human DU145 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 24445311]
HCT-116 IC50 12 μM Cytotoxicity against human HCT116 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 24445311]
HOP-62 IC50 19 μM Cytotoxicity against human HOP62 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 24445311]
HT-29 IC50 15 μM Cytotoxicity against human HT-29 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 24445311]
MCF7 EC50 < 1 nM Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells after 5 days by Presto blue reagent-based fluorescence analysis 10.1039/C5MD00493D
OVCAR-3 IC50 16 μM Cytotoxicity against human OVCAR3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 24445311]
SK-HEP1 IC50 12 μM Cytotoxicity against human SKHEP1 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 24445311]
SQ20B IC50 5.5 μM Cytotoxicity against human SQ20B cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 24445311]
SQ20B IC50 7.3 μM Cytotoxicity against human SQ20B cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 24836070]

12 records · Scroll to view more

In Vitro Studies

In NCI-H446 small cell lung cancer cells, RAD001 combined with BYL719 or MK-2206 produced ZIP synergy scores of 12.889 and 10.688 in 72-h viability profiling. CAL-101/RAD001 scored 5.878 and was classified as additive. These partner-dependent combination effects should not be interpreted as RAD001 monotherapy efficacy. [1]

RAD001 combination profiling and signaling in NCI-H446 cells

Cell-based study · Human NCI-H446 small cell lung cancer cells [1]

RAD001 combinations with BYL719 or MK-2206 showed ZIP synergy in a 72-h cell viability assay. CAL-101/RAD001 was additive under the authors’ >10 synergy criterion. Companion immunoblots included single-agent and combination controls; these data do not establish single-agent apoptosis or animal efficacy of RAD001.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
RAD001 plus BYL719 interaction in cell viabilityZIP synergy score 12.889[1]
RAD001 plus MK-2206 interaction in cell viabilityZIP synergy score 10.688[1]
CAL-101 plus RAD001 interaction in cell viabilityZIP synergy score 5.878[1]
Single-agent RAD001 signaling responsequalitative immunoblot Reduced p-P70S6K(T389), with retained p-4EBP1(T37/T46) signal and increased p-AKT signals relative to DMSO at 1 µM RAD001[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
RAD001 matrix: 0–1000 nM; BYL719 or MK-2206 matrix: 0–10 µM (Fig. 2C). Single-agent signaling: 10, 100 and 1000 nM RAD001 (Fig. 2B). Fig. 2E single/combination treatments: 1.0 µM per indicated drug.
Exposure duration
72 h for viability matrices; 24 h for Fig. 2B immunoblots.
Method
Cell treatment followed by PrestoBlue fluorescence viability or Western blotting.
Vehicle
DMSO lane and mock controls in Fig. 2B; viability normalized to untreated cells. Vehicle percentage for viability not specified in the read methods.
Co-treatment
BYL719 (alpelisib), MK-2206 or CAL-101 in distinct combinations with RAD001; effects are not assigned to RAD001 alone.
Reported limits
No current-lot analytical validation; exact viability vehicle percentage and independent matrix repeat count not specified. Fig. 2E duration is not stated in its caption and is not assumed from Fig. 2B.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Everolimus; Compound label in the paper: RAD001

Evidence applies to the named tested material and model; it does not validate a current Adooq lot or establish clinical efficacy.

Methods: Test compounds, Cell viability, Immunoblotting; Results: Synergistic effects of PI3Kα and mTOR; Fig. 2B–E and caption

RAD001 plus BYL719 interaction in cell viability: PrestoBlue viability normalized to untreated cells; SynergyFinder ZIP model. Eight-point titrations for general viability methods were performed in triplicate; independent repeat count for the synergy matrix is not specified in Fig. 2. — Fig. 2C–D; Methods: Cell viability

RAD001 plus MK-2206 interaction in cell viability: Same combination profiling design. — Fig. 2C–D

CAL-101 plus RAD001 interaction in cell viability: ZIP; authors classify as additive, using >10 as the synergy criterion. — Fig. 2D; Results: Synergistic effects

Single-agent RAD001 signaling response: 24-h Western blot with total-protein, β-ACTIN and GAPDH controls; qualitative assessment, no densitometry estimated. — Fig. 2B and caption

In Vivo Studies

In four patient-derived HCC xenograft lines in SCID mice, oral RAD001 slowed tumor growth without regression. At 2.5 mg/kg daily for 18 days, median terminal tumor-weight T/C ratios ranged from 0.11 to 0.48. Tumor signaling and proliferation were suppressed, but cleaved caspase-3 positivity did not significantly increase. The immunocompromised, non-cirrhotic model limits clinical extrapolation. [2]

Growth and pharmacodynamic responses of four HCC xenograft lines

Animal study · Male SCID mice, 9–10 weeks; subcutaneous patient-derived HCC lines 26-1004, 2-1318, 5-1318 and 30-1004 [2]

Daily oral RAD001 reduced tumor growth rates without tumor regression. At 2.5 mg/kg/day, terminal median tumor-weight T/C ratios varied by line. Tumor p70S6K/S6 phosphorylation and proliferation decreased, while cleaved caspase-3 positivity did not significantly change. Immunocompromised hosts and non-cirrhotic livers limit translation.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Median terminal tumor weight: treated/control by xenograft lineT/C ratio 26-1004: 0.11; 2-1318: 0.19; 5-1318: 0.14; 30-1004: 0.48[2]
Tumor growth during treatmentqualitative Slower growth without regressions[2]
Tumor mTOR-pathway pharmacodynamicsqualitative immunoblot Reduced p-p70S6K(Thr389) and p-S6R(Ser235/236); no reported impact on Akt phosphorylation[2]
Cleaved caspase-3-positive tumor cellssignificance No significant difference between vehicle and RAD001 groups[2]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Oral
Frequency
Daily
Treatment course
18 days
Vehicle
RAD001 supplied as a 2% microemulsion suspended in water; vehicle control 200 µl. Exact excipient composition not specified.
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
RAD001 monotherapy, 2.5 mg/kg/day
2.5 mg/kg
Vehicle-treated tumor-bearing mice of the corresponding xenograft lineMedian terminal tumor-weight T/C: 0.11, 0.19, 0.14 and 0.48 for 26-1004, 2-1318, 5-1318 and 30-1004, respectively; reduced growth without regression; no significant cleaved caspase-3 increase.[2]
RAD001 monotherapy, 2.5 mg/kg/day
Model: Male SCID mice, 9–10 weeks; subcutaneous patient-derived HCC lines 26-1004, 2-1318, 5-1318 and 30-1004
Reported limits: Exact microemulsion excipients not specified.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Everolimus; Compound label in the paper: RAD001

Evidence applies to the named tested material and model; it does not validate a current Adooq lot or establish clinical efficacy.

Materials and methods: Reagents, Effects of RAD001 on xenografts, Western blot and immunohistochemical analyses; Results; Figs 2–4; Table 1

Median terminal tumor weight: treated/control by xenograft line: Tumor weights on treatment day 18; ratios explicitly reported in Results, not estimated from graphs. Three of four lines satisfy the paper’s active-response cutoff. — Results paragraph preceding Fig. 3; Fig. 3 labels; xenograft Methods

Tumor growth during treatment: Caliper-derived volumes. Fig. 2 caption: 14 independent tumor-bearing mice per treatment arm; plotted mean ± S.E.; experiments repeated three times with similar results. These are not pooled as n=42. — Fig. 2B–D and caption; Results

Tumor mTOR-pathway pharmacodynamics: Tumor lysates on day 18; 3–4 independent tumors homogenized separately per Methods, representative blots with total-protein comparisons. — Fig. 4 and caption; Western blot Methods; Results

Cleaved caspase-3-positive tumor cells: Immunohistochemistry; at least 500 cells per region counted. This is a negative endpoint, not proof that apoptosis cannot occur in other settings. — Table 1; Results paragraph following Fig. 4; Immunohistochemical analysis

RAD001 monotherapy, 2.5 mg/kg/day · Materials and methods: Reagents, Effects of RAD001 on xenografts, Western blot and immunohistochemical analyses; Results; Figs 2–4; Table 1

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
Actions Inhibitor
CAS Number 159351-69-6
Applications mTOR inhibitor
Formula C53H83NO14
Molecular Weight 958.2
Synonyms SDZ-RAD; Certican; Zortress; Afinitor; RAD001
SMILES
C[C@@H]1CC[C@H]2C[C@@H](/C(=C/C=C/C=C/[C@H](C[C@H](C(=O)[C@@H]([C@@H](/C(=C/[C@H](C(=O)C[C@H](OC(=O)[C@@H]3CCCCN3C(=O)C(=O)[C@@]1(O2)O)[C@H](C)C[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@@H](C4)OC)OCCO)C)/C)O)OC)C)C)/C)OC

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO 91 mg/mL (94.97 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol 6 mg/mL (6.26 mM)

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

In Vivo Preparation

Concentration
4 mg/mL
Vehicle
30% Propylene glycol (dissolve first)+5% Tween 80+ddH2O

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Hung MC, Wang WP, Chi YH. AKT phosphorylation as a predictive biomarker for PI3K/mTOR dual inhibition-induced proteolytic cleavage of mTOR companion proteins in small cell lung cancer. Cell & bioscience (2022). PMID: 35918763 DOI: 10.1186/s13578-022-00862-y Source material
  2. [2] Huynh H, Chow KH, Soo KC, et al. RAD001 (everolimus) inhibits tumour growth in xenograft models of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of cellular and molecular medicine (2009). PMID: 18466352 DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00364.x Source material

Publications

10 publications citing this product

  1. Majid Momeny, .et al. , EMBO Mol Med, 2024, Jun 17 PMID: 38886591
  2. Ming-Chun Hung, .et al. , Cell Biosci, 2022, 12: 122 PMID: 35918763
  3. Yusuke Murase, .et al. , Oncol Rep, 2022, Apr;47(4):61 PMID: 35088890
  4. Gabriela Torres-Flores, .et al. , Adv Polym Technol, 2020, ID 5462949
  5. Takaaki Fujimura, .et al. , Cancer Biol Ther, 2020, Sep 1;21(9):863-870 PMID: 32835580
  6. BD Henriksbo, .et al. , Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2020, Jul 1;319(1):E110-E116 PMID: 32421368
  7. Hiroshi Fukamachi, .et al. , J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2019, 38:127 PMID: 30866995
  8. Nachi Namatame, .et al. , Oncotarget, 2018, Oct 12; 9(80): 35141-35161 PMID: 30416685
  9. Hirosumi Tamura, .et al. , Oncol Rep, 2018, Aug; 40(2): 635-646 PMID: 29917168
  10. Rieko Ohki, .et al. , Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014, 111(23): E2404-E2413 PMID: 24912192

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...