Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Mycophenolate mofetil

Cat. No. A10613 CAS 128794-94-5

IMPDH inhibitor

Mycophenolate mofetil is a reversible inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) in purine biosynthesis (specifically guanine synthesis) which is necessary for the growth of T cells and B cells.

In Stock

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

Guanosine reversed MMF-associated growth inhibition in primary human Tenon fibroblasts, supporting interference with de novo guanosine synthesis. This cellular rescue experiment did not directly measure IMPDH inhibition or establish an enzyme IC50. [1]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase II 27 nM
Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase I 39 nM

Cellular Effect

Cell Line Activity Value Description Reference
BHK-21 CC50 3.43 μM cytotoxicity against golden hamster BHK-21 cells incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 32845145]
LLC-MK2 CC50 3.01 μM Cytotoxicity against Rhesus macaque LLC-MK2 cells incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 32845145]
Splenocyte EC50 0.48 μM Immunosuppressive activity in BALB/c mouse splenocytes assessed as reduction in LPS-induced mouse B-lymphocytes proliferation incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 36596229]
Splenocyte IC50 0.5 μM Immunosuppressive activity in BALB/c mouse splenocytes assessed as inhibition of LPS-stimulated B-cell proliferation incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 33544615]

In Vitro Studies

In human Tenon fibroblasts, 14-day exposure to 1 or 10 μM MMF reduced cell counts to 71% (SD 6.4) or 7.7% (SD 0.9) of control, respectively (both p<0.001). Addition of 100 μM guanosine restored counts to values statistically equal to control. [1]

Guanosine rescue of MMF-associated human Tenon fibroblast growth inhibition

Cell-based study · Primary human Tenon fibroblasts from cataract-surgery tissue explants, passages 3–7 [1]

MMF reduced cell accumulation in a concentration-dependent manner. At day 14, cell counts were 71% (SD 6.4) and 7.7% (SD 0.9) of control at 1 and 10 μM, respectively (both p<0.001). Supplementation with 100 μM guanosine restored counts to values statistically equal to control. Four separate experiments were performed in triplicate; these are not 12 independent donors.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Day-14 cell count at 1 μM MMF, relative to the same-day untreated controlRelative cell count 71% (SD 6.4); p<0.001 versus control (100%)[1]
Day-14 cell count at 10 μM MMF, relative to the same-day untreated controlRelative cell count 7.7% (SD 0.9); p<0.001 versus control (100%)[1]
MMF-treated cell counts with 100 μM guanosineGuanosine rescue Statistically equal to control; no exact rescue percentage or P value reported in text[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
MMF: 1 or 10 μM; guanosine rescue: 100 μM
Exposure duration
Cell counts at 7, 14 and 21 days; exact numerical extraction restricted to day 14
Method
Incubation in culture medium; manual counts of bisbenzimide-stained cells in six visual fields per well
Co-treatment
Guanosine was a mechanistic rescue condition, with untreated and guanosine-only controls.
Reported limits
Separate solvent/vehicle control and donor count are not specified. Salt form of the IV preparation is not stated. No MPA concentration, MMF hydrolysis, intracellular guanosine pool or direct IMPDH activity was measured.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Mycophenolate mofetil; Compound label in the paper: MMF; CellCept solution for intravenous application (Roche)

Evidence for the reported formulated MMF in cultured fibroblasts; no surgical efficacy or Adooq lot claim.

Materials and Method: Cell proliferation studies with guanosine; Results (day 14); Figure 2 and caption

Day-14 cell count at 1 μM MMF, relative to the same-day untreated control: Manual fluorescence cell counting; four separate experiments in triplicate; Figure 2 data expressed as means (SD). — Materials and Method: Cell proliferation studies with guanosine; Results (day 14); Figure 2 and caption

Day-14 cell count at 10 μM MMF, relative to the same-day untreated control: Manual fluorescence cell counting; four separate experiments in triplicate; Figure 2 data expressed as means (SD). — Materials and Method: Cell proliferation studies with guanosine; Results (day 14); Figure 2 and caption

MMF-treated cell counts with 100 μM guanosine: Manual fluorescence cell counting; four separate experiments in triplicate; Figure 2 data expressed as means (SD). — Materials and Method: Cell proliferation studies with guanosine; Results (day 14); Figure 2 and caption

In Vivo Studies

In a rat wound-healing model, oral MMF increased ileal strength at day 3 but showed no significant colonic breaking-strength effect. At 40 mg/kg/day begun on the operation day, abdominal-wall strength decreased at day 7 (P=0.022). High-dose animals also had greater weight loss and two deaths of uncertain cause. These tissue-specific findings do not establish clinical wound safety. [2]

Tissue- and timing-dependent wound strength after oral MMF in rats

Animal study · Male Wistar rats (240–260 g) after ileal and colonic anastomoses and abdominal-wall closure [2]

Oral MMF produced different responses by tissue and time. Ileal strength increased at day 3; no significant colonic strength difference was reported. Abdominal-wall breaking strength was lower at day 7 with 40 mg/kg/day begun on day 0 (P=0.022); this decrease was not significant when initiation was delayed until day 3. Greater weight loss and two deaths of uncertain cause limit interpretation of the high dose.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Ileal anastomotic strength at day 3 with day-0 MMF versus salineBetween-group comparison Bursting pressure higher: P = 0.034 and 0.048; breaking strength higher: P = 0.014 and 0.041 (20 and 40 mg/kg/day, respectively)[2]
Colonic anastomotic breaking strength at days 3 and 7Between-group comparison No statistically significant difference reported; no exact mechanical strength inferred from plots[2]
Abdominal-wall breaking strength at day 7, 40 mg/kg/day begun on day 0 versus salineBetween-group comparison Decreased; P = 0.022[2]
High-dose postoperative observationsAdverse observations Greater weight loss on days 4–6; one death in each 40 mg/kg/day schedule, cause unknown; distended small bowel found at autopsy[2]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Oral
Frequency
Daily
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
MMF 20, immediate start
20 mg/kg/day
Saline orally from day 0; shared operation and perioperative careHigher ileal strength at day 3; no significant colonic breaking-strength difference reported.[2]
MMF 40, immediate start
40 mg/kg/day
Saline orally from day 0; shared operation and perioperative careHigher ileal strength at day 3 and lower abdominal-wall strength at day 7; one death of unknown cause.[2]
MMF 20, delayed start
20 mg/kg/day
Saline orally from day 0; shared operation and perioperative careAt day 7, no significant abdominal-wall breaking-strength decrease reported versus control.[2]
MMF 40, delayed start
40 mg/kg/day
Saline orally from day 0; shared operation and perioperative careAt day 7, no significant abdominal-wall breaking-strength decrease reported versus control; one death of unknown cause.[2]
MMF 20, immediate start
Model: Male Wistar rats (240–260 g) after ileal and colonic anastomoses and abdominal-wall closure
Treatment course: From postoperative day 0 until assessment; day-0 schedules assessed on day 3 or 7; delayed schedules on day 7.
Reported limits: Endpoint-specific final n and MMF vehicle not fully specified; planned allocation described at study level.
MMF 40, immediate start
Model: Male Wistar rats (240–260 g) after ileal and colonic anastomoses and abdominal-wall closure
Treatment course: From postoperative day 0 until assessment; day-0 schedules assessed on day 3 or 7; delayed schedules on day 7.
Reported limits: Endpoint-specific final n and MMF vehicle not fully specified; planned allocation described at study level.
MMF 20, delayed start
Model: Male Wistar rats (240–260 g) after ileal and colonic anastomoses and abdominal-wall closure
Treatment course: From postoperative day 3 until assessment; day-0 schedules assessed on day 3 or 7; delayed schedules on day 7.
Reported limits: Endpoint-specific final n and MMF vehicle not fully specified; planned allocation described at study level.
MMF 40, delayed start
Model: Male Wistar rats (240–260 g) after ileal and colonic anastomoses and abdominal-wall closure
Treatment course: From postoperative day 3 until assessment; day-0 schedules assessed on day 3 or 7; delayed schedules on day 7.
Reported limits: Endpoint-specific final n and MMF vehicle not fully specified; planned allocation described at study level.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Mycophenolate mofetil; Compound label in the paper: MMF; CellCept (Roche)

Preclinical tissue-specific wound-strength findings; not a general claim that MMF improves healing or is clinically safe.

Materials and Methods: group allocation, Wound Strength, Statistical Analysis; Results: Weight and Wound Strength; Figures 1, 2 and 4; Discussion limitations

Ileal anastomotic strength at day 3 with day-0 MMF versus saline: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for strength; one-way ANOVA for body weight; deaths are descriptive observations. — Results: Wound Strength; Figures 2A and 4A

Colonic anastomotic breaking strength at days 3 and 7: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for strength; one-way ANOVA for body weight; deaths are descriptive observations. — Results: Wound Strength; Figure 4B

Abdominal-wall breaking strength at day 7, 40 mg/kg/day begun on day 0 versus saline: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for strength; one-way ANOVA for body weight; deaths are descriptive observations. — Results: Wound Strength; Figure 4C

High-dose postoperative observations: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for strength; one-way ANOVA for body weight; deaths are descriptive observations. — Results: Weight; Figure 1; Discussion

MMF 20, immediate start · Materials and Methods: group allocation, Wound Strength, Statistical Analysis; Results: Weight and Wound Strength; Figures 1, 2 and 4; Discussion limitations

MMF 40, immediate start · Materials and Methods: group allocation, Wound Strength, Statistical Analysis; Results: Weight and Wound Strength; Figures 1, 2 and 4; Discussion limitations

MMF 20, delayed start · Materials and Methods: group allocation, Wound Strength, Statistical Analysis; Results: Weight and Wound Strength; Figures 1, 2 and 4; Discussion limitations

MMF 40, delayed start · Materials and Methods: group allocation, Wound Strength, Statistical Analysis; Results: Weight and Wound Strength; Figures 1, 2 and 4; Discussion limitations

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
Actions Inhibitor
CAS Number 128794-94-5
Applications IMPDH inhibitor
Formula C23H31NO7
Molecular Weight 433.5
Synonyms RS 61443; TM-MMF; CellCept
SMILES
CC1=C(C(=C(C2=C1COC2=O)O)C/C=C(\C)/CCC(=O)OCCN3CCOCC3)OC

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO 77 mg/mL (177.62 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol Insoluble

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

In Vivo Preparation

Concentration
19 mg/mL
Vehicle
0.5% methylcellulose

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] C Heinz, K Heise, T Hudde, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil inhibits human Tenon fibroblast proliferation by guanosine depletion The British journal of ophthalmology (2003). PMID: 14609842 DOI: 10.1136/bjo.87.11.1397 Source material
  2. [2] Martine CM Willems, Thijs Hendriks, Roger MLM Lomme, et al. The Effect of Mycophenolate Mofetil on Early Wound Healing in a Rodent Model Transplantation direct (2016). PMID: 27500270 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000591 Source material

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...