Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Ampalex (CX-516)

Cat. No. A12349 CAS 154235-83-3
Ampalex is an ampakine and nootropic that acts as an AMPA receptor positive allosteric modulator

In Stock

Publications for Ampalex

2 publications citing this product

  1. Mariusz Papp, .et al. , J Psychopharmacol, 2020, Dec;34(12):1418-1430 PMID: 33200659
  2. Abigail Benn, .et al. , J Neurosci, 2016, May 4; 36(18):4930-4939 PMID: 27147648

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

CX516 enhances excitatory synaptic responses in a model-dependent setting. In acute cortical slices from Stxbp1-haploinsufficient mice, 30 μM CX516 increased evoked EPSP amplitudes in both PV+ interneurons and pyramidal cells. These functional data support AMPA-receptor modulation; they do not measure binding affinity or receptor deactivation kinetics. [1]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
AMPA Receptor  

In Vitro Studies

Acute bath application of CX516 (30 μM) increased layer-4-evoked EPSP amplitude in layer 2/3 neurons of Stxbp1-haploinsufficient mouse cortical slices. The paired predrug comparisons showed small increases in both PV+ interneurons and pyramidal cells (n = 6 per panel; p = 0.03). Exposure duration and solvent were not specified in the retrieved pharmacological methods. [1]

Acute CX516 potentiation of evoked cortical EPSPs

Cell-based study · Acute somatosensory cortical slices from P15–22 Stxbp1-haploinsufficient mice; layer 2/3 PV+ interneurons and pyramidal cells; both sexes used in study. [1]

Bath-applied CX516 increased layer-4-evoked EPSP amplitude in both recorded cell classes relative to predrug recordings. These are slice electrophysiology results; they do not establish clinical seizure efficacy.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Evoked EPSP amplitude in PV+ interneuronsmean ± SEM 4.7 ± 1.0 to 5.1 ± 1.0 mV; n = 6; p = 0.03[1]
Evoked EPSP amplitude in pyramidal cellsmean ± SEM 20.2 ± 1.4 to 22.0 ± 1.4 mV; n = 6; p = 0.03[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
30 μM
Method
Acute bath application during whole-cell recordings
Reported limits
Exposure duration and CX516 solvent are not specified in the retrieved pharmacological results/methods. Panel n does not specify independent animal count.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: CX516; Compound label in the paper: CX516

Supports compound-level AMPAR-associated synaptic potentiation in this slice model; not supplier equivalence or direct binding kinetics.

Figure 7J–K and caption; Results: Impairment of excitatory synapses leads to hyperexcitability of pyramidal neurons; STAR Methods: Key resources table, Electrophysiology, Recordings, Stimulation, Data analysis

Evoked EPSP amplitude in PV+ interneurons: Whole-cell current-clamp; predrug versus CX516 in Stxbp1-haploinsufficient slices; caption reports n = 6 without an animal count for this panel. — Figure 7J and caption

Evoked EPSP amplitude in pyramidal cells: Whole-cell current-clamp; predrug versus CX516. Methods specify paired Wilcoxon matched-pairs comparisons; caption does not restate the test. — Figure 7K and caption

In Vivo Studies

Local prefrontal CX516 improved object-in-place recognition in male Lister hooded rats at 0.3 μg/μl, but not 0.1 μg/μl, without significantly changing total exploration. In a separate study of stressed Wistar–Kyoto rats, local CX-516 improved novel-object recognition and partially restored sucrose intake; the higher dose also increased exploration. These task- and condition-specific effects do not establish a general cognitive benefit. [2,3]

In male Tm4sf2−/y mice, CX516 at 5 mg/kg intraperitoneally twice daily for five days restored hippocampal AMPAR rectification and long-term potentiation toward wild-type vehicle values. These endpoints were measured in slices after systemic treatment; reported n values for the physiological results denote cells or slices. [4]

Local prefrontal CX516 and associative recognition memory

Animal study · Male Lister hooded rats, 300–350 g at experiment start; object-in-place task; final CX516 analysis n = 8. [2]

Bilateral mPFC CX516 improved object-in-place discrimination at 0.3 μg/μl, whereas 0.1 μg/μl did not significantly differ from saline. Total exploration was unchanged. Separate CX546 and MMPIP treatments were ineffective; no combination benefit was tested.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Object-in-place discrimination ratioRepeated-measures ANOVA and dose comparisons F(2,14) = 4.95, p = 0.024; 0.3 μg/μl versus vehicle p = 0.008; 0.1 μg/μl versus vehicle p = 0.128; n = 8[2]
Total object exploration in sample and test phasesRepeated-measures ANOVA Sample F(2,14) = 2.64, p = 0.107; test F(2,14) = 0.08, p = 0.926[2]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Bilateral intra-mPFC
Frequency
Within-subject dose sessions; at least 3 days between infusions
Treatment course
Administered after sample, during 5 min delay
Vehicle
0.9% saline
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
CX516 concentration series
0.1 and 0.3 μg/μl; 0.5 μl per hemisphere
Own saline vehicle sessions; all animals received each treatment in a counterbalanced design0.3 μg/μl improved discrimination; 0.1 μg/μl did not significantly improve it. Neither concentration significantly changed total exploration.[2]
CX516 concentration series
Model: Male Lister hooded rats; final n = 8
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: CX516; Compound label in the paper: CX516

Historical AdooQ sourcing can be stated for this paper only; it does not validate any current A12349 lot.

Experiment 3 results; Figure 6A–B and caption; Table 2; Materials and Methods: Subjects, Drug infusions, Behavioral testing, Statistical analysis

Object-in-place discrimination ratio: Within-subject fully counterbalanced Latin square; blinded experimenter; doses compared with their own vehicle control. No exact bar heights extracted. — Experiment 3 results; Figure 6A and caption

Total object exploration in sample and test phases: No significant CX516 effect on total exploration. Table 2 displays mean ± SEM; sample duration 5 min, test duration 3 min. — Experiment 3 results; Table 2 and footnote

CX516 concentration series · Experiment 3 results; Figure 6A–B and caption; Table 2; Materials and Methods: Subjects, Drug infusions, Behavioral testing, Statistical analysis

Prefrontal CX-516 in stressed Wistar–Kyoto rats

Animal study · Male Wistar–Kyoto rats exposed to chronic mild stress and non-stressed controls; Experiment 4, n = 8 per stress-by-dose group. [3]

Local CX-516 restored novel-object recognition in stressed animals and partially restored sucrose intake. The higher dose also increased exploratory behavior in both stress conditions, limiting a purely memory-specific interpretation. Locomotor activity was not significantly altered.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Novel-object recognition, exploration and locomotor activityBehavioral direction Dose-dependent restoration of NOR in stressed animals; no effect on NOR in non-stressed controls; higher dose increased exploration in both; locomotor effect not significant; n = 8/group[3]
Sucrose intakeDose effect in stress strata Stressed: F(2,21) = 8.23, p < 0.002; non-stressed: F(2,21) = 0.35; stress × dose F(2,42) = 1.41, NS[3]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Unilateral left intra-mPFC
Frequency
Two administrations separated by four days
Treatment course
After NOR exposure; four days later before final sucrose test
Vehicle
0.9% sterile saline
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
CX-516 dose series in stressed and non-stressed rats
0.05 or 0.15 μg in 0.5 μL
Saline in both stressed and non-stressed groupsNOR improved in stressed rats; sucrose intake partially restored at both doses. Higher dose increased exploration in both stress conditions; locomotion unchanged.[3]
CX-516 dose series in stressed and non-stressed rats
Model: Male WKY; n = 8 per stress-by-dose group
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: CX516; Compound label in the paper: CX-516

Supports model- and task-specific behavioral effects; no clinical antidepressant efficacy or current-lot validation.

Methods: Study design, Experiment 4, NOR test, Intracranial injections, Drugs, Statistical analysis; Results: Antidepressant-like effects of the ampakine CX-516; Figure 6A–D and caption; Discussion limits

Novel-object recognition, exploration and locomotor activity: NOR retention trial one hour after exposure; blinded observer. Recognition index = (novel − familiar exploration)/total exploration. Values plotted as means + SEM; no exact means read from bars. — Experiment 4 results; Figure 6A–C and caption

Sucrose intake: Second injection 15 min before final sucrose test, four days after NOR injection. Stress-stratified dose analyses were exploratory; both doses partially restored intake in stressed animals. — Experiment 4 results; Figure 6D and caption

CX-516 dose series in stressed and non-stressed rats · Methods: Study design, Experiment 4, NOR test, Intracranial injections, Drugs, Statistical analysis; Results: Antidepressant-like effects of the ampakine CX-516; Figure 6A–D and caption; Discussion limits

Systemic CX516 and hippocampal synaptic physiology

Animal study · Male Tm4sf2−/y and Tm4sf2+/y mice; chronic systemic treatment followed by ex vivo hippocampal CA1 recordings; electrophysiology methods describe 60-day-old mice and three mice per genotype/treatment. [4]

After five days of CX516 treatment, abnormal AMPAR rectification and impaired long-term potentiation in Tm4sf2−/y mice shifted toward wild-type control values. Recording-unit counts are cells or slices, not independent animals. This is an in vivo treatment design with ex vivo endpoints.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
AMPAR rectification index, current amplitude at −60 mV divided by +40 mVmean ± SEM WT vehicle 3.2 ± 0.3 (n_cells = 9); KO vehicle 5.5 ± 0.8 (n_cells = 8); WT CX516 2.9 ± 0.2 (n_cells = 5); KO CX516 3.20 ± 0.18 (n_cells = 7)[4]
Long-term potentiation of CA1 fEPSP slopemean ± SEM WT vehicle 176.0 ± 14.2% (n_slices = 6); KO vehicle 123.0 ± 7.6% (n_slices = 7); WT CX516 205.1 ± 19.7% (n_slices = 5); KO CX516 172.6 ± 6.8% (n_slices = 7)[4]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Intraperitoneal
Frequency
Twice daily, morning and evening
Treatment course
3 days vehicle habituation followed by 5 days CX516; last injection 15 h before experiments
Vehicle
Saline plus 15–20% 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
Chronic CX516 versus vehicle
5 mg/kg per injection
Genotype-matched vehicle groups; wild-type CX516 group also includedAMPAR rectification and LTP in knockout slices approached wild-type vehicle levels; modestly higher LTP also observed in treated wild-type slices.[4]
Chronic CX516 versus vehicle
Model: Male Tm4sf2−/y and Tm4sf2+/y mice; 60–90 days in treatment methods
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: CX516; Compound label in the paper: CX516

Compound-level systemic research; ex vivo endpoints do not establish clinical efficacy or molecular binding kinetics.

Materials and Methods: Animals, Electrophysiology, CX516 Chronic Treatment, Data Analysis; Results: Treatment With the Ampakine CX516 Rescues Synaptic Alterations; Figure 5A–C and caption

AMPAR rectification index, current amplitude at −60 mV divided by +40 mV: Whole-cell CA1 recordings; one-way ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post test; figure annotates *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. No comparison-specific exact p values inferred. — Figure 5B; CX516 synaptic rescue results; Electrophysiology

Long-term potentiation of CA1 fEPSP slope: Schaffer collateral stimulation and CA1 stratum radiatum field recording; Figure 5C displays final 10 min; one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post test. Multiple slices from mice are not independent animal replicates. — Figure 5C; CX516 synaptic rescue results

Chronic CX516 versus vehicle · Materials and Methods: Animals, Electrophysiology, CX516 Chronic Treatment, Data Analysis; Results: Treatment With the Ampakine CX516 Rescues Synaptic Alterations; Figure 5A–C and caption

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
Actions Modulator
CAS Number 154235-83-3
Formula C14H15N3O
Molecular Weight 241.29
Synonyms CX516
SMILES
C1CCN(CC1)C(=O)C2=CC3=NC=CN=C3C=C2

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO 41 mg/mL (169.92 mM)
Water 41 mg/mL (169.92 mM)
Ethanol 41 mg/mL (169.92 mM)

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Altair Brito dos Santos, Silas Dalum Larsen, Liangchen Guo, et al. Microcircuit failure in STXBP1 encephalopathy leads to hyperexcitability Cell reports. Medicine (2023). PMID: 38086378 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101308 Source material
  2. [2] Abigail Benn, Gareth R I Barker, Sarah A Stuart, et al. Optogenetic Stimulation of Prefrontal Glutamatergic Neurons Enhances Recognition Memory The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience (2016). PMID: 27147648 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2933-15.2016 Source material
  3. [3] Mariusz Papp, Piotr Gruca, Magdalena Lason, et al. AMPA receptors mediate the pro-cognitive effects of electrical and optogenetic stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex in antidepressant non-responsive Wistar-Kyoto rats Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) (2020). PMID: 33200659 DOI: 10.1177/0269881120967857 Source material
  4. [4] Luca Murru, Elena Vezzoli, Anna Longatti, et al. Pharmacological Modulation of AMPAR Rescues Intellectual Disability-Like Phenotype in Tm4sf2-/y Mice Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) (2017). PMID: 28968657 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx221 Source material

Publications

2 publications citing this product

  1. Mariusz Papp, .et al. , J Psychopharmacol, 2020, Dec;34(12):1418-1430 PMID: 33200659
  2. Abigail Benn, .et al. , J Neurosci, 2016, May 4; 36(18):4930-4939 PMID: 27147648

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...