Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Hesperadin

Cat. No. A10448 CAS 422513-13-1

Aurora B Kinase inhibitor

Hesperadin is a human Aurora B inhibitor with an IC50 of 40 nM for the prevention of the phosphorylation of substrate. It markedly reduces the activity of AMPK, Lck, MKK1, MAPKAP-K1, CHK1 and PHK while it does not inhibit MKK1 activity in vivo.

In Stock

Publications for Hesperadin

1 publication citing this product

  1. Wenbin Ji, .et al. , PLoS One, 2016, 11(4): e0153518 PMID: 27082996

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

Hesperadin inhibited histone H3 phosphorylation by immunoprecipitated human Aurora B, with approximately 250 nM required for half-maximal inhibition in the reported biochemical assay. This assay-specific value does not establish exclusive kinase selectivity or a cellular treatment dose. [1]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
TbAUK1 (Cell-free assay) 40 nM
Aurora B (human) (Cell-free assay) 250 nM

In Vitro Studies

Hesperadin’s checkpoint effects depend on the arrest condition and concentration. In HeLa cells, 100 nM Hesperadin induced mitotic exit within 1 h after taxol or monastrol arrest, while nocodazole-treated cells remained arrested for at least 3 h. A later HeLa study found longer arrest at high nocodazole with 100 nM hesperadin and markedly shorter arrest when hesperadin was increased to 0.5–1.0 μM. These experiments used spindle-poison co-treatment. [1,2]

In RPE1 cells treated for 10 h with 3.2 μM nocodazole, adding 100 nM Hesperadin did not significantly reduce kinetochore-associated Mad2. This negative result limits generalization of checkpoint disruption across cell models and treatment conditions. [3]

In a GFP-MELK localization experiment, 100 nM Hesperadin did not cause premature cortex association of GFP-MELK in prometaphase HeLa cells, unlike OTSSP167. The paper identifies the Hesperadin source as Adooq bioscience; this does not validate a particular catalog lot. [4]

Inhibition of immunoprecipitated human Aurora B

Biochemical assay · Human Aurora B immunoprecipitated from mitotic HeLa cell extracts; histone H3 phosphorylation assay. Cdk1/histone H1 assessed in parallel. [1]

Hesperadin reduced Aurora B-dependent histone H3 phosphorylation. The authors reported approximately 250 nM for half-maximal inhibition in this assay; this is an assay endpoint, not a cell treatment recommendation.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Half-maximal inhibition of histone H3 phosphorylation by immunoprecipitated Aurora BHalf-maximal inhibitory concentration Approximately 250 nM[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Hesperadin concentration series shown in Fig. 2D (1–5,000 nM for Aurora B).
Method
Added directly to in vitro kinase reactions.
Vehicle
0.1% DMSO control.
Co-treatment
None; Cdk1 assayed separately.
Reported limits
Reaction duration, ATP concentration and replicate number are not established from the acquired main-text/caption scope. Detailed SI methods were not retrieved.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Hesperadin; Compound label in the paper: Hesperadin

Results apply to the reported experimental material and conditions; no equivalence to a particular Adooq lot is established.

Fig. 2D and caption; Results: Hesperadin inhibits Aurora B function; Fig. 1A structure

Half-maximal inhibition of histone H3 phosphorylation by immunoprecipitated Aurora B: In vitro kinase reaction with immunoprecipitated human Aurora B and histone H3; radiolabeled phosphorylation detected after electrophoresis. Controls: 0.1% DMSO, no substrate and nonspecific-antibody immunoprecipitate. — Results: Hesperadin inhibits Aurora B function, paragraph beginning Approximately 250 nM; Fig. 2D and caption

Spindle-poison-dependent mitotic exit in HeLa cells

Cell-based study · HeLa cells arrested with nocodazole, taxol or monastrol, then exposed to Hesperadin or DMSO. [1]

Addition of Hesperadin rapidly overcame taxol- or monastrol-associated arrest, whereas nocodazole-treated cells retained mitotic arrest for at least 3 h. These are conditional results in cells already exposed to spindle poisons.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Timing of mitotic exit following Hesperadin addition in spindle-poison-arrested HeLa cellsReported time to mitotic exit/arrest persistence Taxol or monastrol: exited within 1 h; nocodazole: remained arrested for at least 3 h.[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
100 nM Hesperadin; arrest agents: 330 nM nocodazole, 10 μM taxol or 100 μM monastrol.
Exposure duration
Sampled after addition from 30 min through 7 h; monastrol images at 7 h marked not determined.
Method
Added after drug-induced mitotic arrest; chromosome spreads or immunofluorescence.
Vehicle
DMSO solvent controls; final percentage not specified for this experiment in the acquired main text.
Co-treatment
Each arrest agent retained as its own condition; no Hesperadin-alone outcome inferred.
Reported limits
Arrest induction duration and sample counts for Fig. 8A–D were not established in the acquired scope; SI detailed methods not retrieved.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Hesperadin; Compound label in the paper: Hesperadin

Results apply to the reported experimental material and conditions; no equivalence to a particular Adooq lot is established.

Fig. 8A–D and caption; corresponding Results subsection; Materials and methods: Cell culture and synchronization

Timing of mitotic exit following Hesperadin addition in spindle-poison-arrested HeLa cells: Chromosome spreading for nocodazole/taxol conditions; immunofluorescence for monastrol; DMSO controls under each arrest condition. Fig. 8D quantifies the same samples. — Fig. 8A–D and caption; Results: Hesperadin treatment rapidly overrides the spindle assembly checkpoint in taxol- and monastrol-treated cells but not in nocodazole-treated cells

Dose and nocodazole context alter checkpoint duration

Cell-based study · HeLa cells released from a single thymidine arrest; 5 h later nocodazole and inhibitors were added before live-cell imaging. [2]

At fixed 100 nM hesperadin, mitotic arrest lasted longer at high than at low nocodazole. Increasing hesperadin to 0.5 or 1.0 μM strongly shortened arrest at both 0.33 and 3.3 μM nocodazole. Reversine was a separate checkpoint-override comparator.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Time in mitosis under low/high nocodazole and increasing hesperadinTime in mitosis At high nocodazole and 100 nM hesperadin: ∼700 min versus >1100 min in control cells; 0.5 and 1.0 μM hesperadin strongly shortened arrest at both nocodazole concentrations.[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Hesperadin 100 nM in Fig. 2A; 0.1, 0.5 and 1 μM in Fig. 2B. Nocodazole: 0.33 or 3.3 μM in Fig. 2B; concentration range in Fig. 2A.
Exposure duration
Inhibitors added 5 h after release from single thymidine arrest; cells followed through mitosis.
Method
Nocodazole plus Hesperadin exposure followed by video microscopy.
Vehicle
DMSO comparison in Fig. 2B; final solvent percentage not established in the read scope.
Co-treatment
Nocodazole co-treatment; 1 μM reversine tested separately as positive comparator, not combined with Hesperadin in this adopted study.
Reported limits
Exact means/s.d. and condition-specific n in Supplementary Table SI were not retrieved; no exact values reconstructed. Hesperadin supplier/form characterization not established in the read scope.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Hesperadin; Compound label in the paper: hesperadin

Results apply to the reported experimental material and conditions; no equivalence to a particular Adooq lot is established.

Fig. 2A–B and caption; Results and discussion: Effects on mitotic arrest from inhibiting Aurora B in low or high nocodazole; Materials and methods: Cell culture and synchronization, Video microscopy

Time in mitosis under low/high nocodazole and increasing hesperadin: Time-lapse microscopy; mitotic rounding used to assess time in mitosis. Fig. 2A reports mean and s.d., at least 50 cells per condition; Fig. 2B follows the same filming approach. Numerical approximations here are from Results prose, not curve estimation. — Fig. 2A–B and caption; Results and discussion: Effects on mitotic arrest from inhibiting Aurora B in low or high nocodazole

Mad2 retention at kinetochores in nocodazole-treated RPE1 cells

Cell-based study · Human RPE1 cells treated with 3.2 μM nocodazole, with or without 100 nM Hesperadin, for 10 h. [3]

Under this condition, Hesperadin did not measurably reduce kinetochore-associated Mad2 relative to nocodazole alone. This is a model- and condition-specific negative result.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Kinetochore-associated Mad2 fluorescence normalized to anti-centromere antibody (ACA)Relative Mad2 fluorescence; Student’s t-test No significant difference reported; Fig. 4D labels p>0.01.[3]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
100 nM Hesperadin with 3.2 μM nocodazole.
Exposure duration
10 h.
Method
Cells fixed and immunostained for Mad2 and ACA; normalized kinetochore intensity compared with nocodazole-only cells.
Vehicle
All drugs diluted in DMSO according to Materials and methods; final concentration and exact vehicle matching not specified in read text.
Co-treatment
Nocodazole co-treatment, compared with nocodazole alone. MG132 conditions in Fig. 4E–G are not part of the adopted B–D experiment.
Reported limits
Hesperadin supplier/lot and exact error-bar definition for Fig. 4D not established in acquired text/caption; no power or equivalence conclusion made.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Hesperadin; Compound label in the paper: Hesperadin

Results apply to the reported experimental material and conditions; no equivalence to a particular Adooq lot is established.

Fig. 4B–D and caption; Results paragraph beginning If aurora B activity is required; Materials and methods: Cell culture, Immunostaining, Mad2 intensity quantification

Kinetochore-associated Mad2 fluorescence normalized to anti-centromere antibody (ACA): Immunofluorescence of Mad2 and ACA; same acquisition settings. 100 sister-kinetochore pairs examined in each of three separate experiments. Nocodazole-only mean normalized to 1. Exact bar heights and error values not extracted. — Fig. 4B–D and caption; Materials and methods: Mad2 intensity quantification

Hesperadin comparator in GFP-MELK localization

Cell-based study · GFP-MELK-transfected HeLa cells (HeLaM subline specified in shared methods), assessed in prometaphase. [4]

Unlike the premature cortical GFP-MELK localization observed after OTSSP167, Hesperadin-treated prometaphase cells did not show this redistribution. The comparison supports a narrow localization result, not a claim about MELK catalytic inhibition.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Premature cortex association of GFP-MELK in prometaphaseQualitative localization No cortex association observed in Hesperadin-treated prometaphase cells.[4]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
100 nM Hesperadin.
Exposure duration
Exposure duration for Hesperadin in Fig. 7C is not explicit in the read caption; 2 h is stated for OTSSP167 in Fig. 7B only.
Method
GFP-MELK-transfected cells exposed to Hesperadin and examined by fluorescence microscopy.
Vehicle
Vehicle for Fig. 7C not explicitly specified; no DMSO percentage assigned.
Co-treatment
No drug combination inferred; OTSSP167, reversine and Plk1 inhibitor III were separate comparators.
Reported limits
Hesperadin exposure time, counted cell numbers and quantitative cortical/cytoplasmic ratios are not specified in the adopted Fig. 7C text/caption.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Hesperadin; Compound label in the paper: Hesperadin

Results apply to the reported experimental material and conditions; no equivalence to a particular Adooq lot is established.

Fig. 7A–C and caption; Results: GFP-MELK localization comparison; Materials and Methods: Cell culture, drug treatment and plasmids; Immunofluorescence and live cell imaging

Premature cortex association of GFP-MELK in prometaphase: Single-plane fluorescence images of GFP-MELK and DAPI; Fig. 7A shows untreated metaphase/anaphase localization, B shows OTSSP167, and C shows Hesperadin and separate kinase-inhibitor comparators. No numerical localization frequency reported in the adopted figure/caption. — Fig. 7A–C and caption; Results: GFP-MELK localization comparison; Materials and Methods: Cell culture, drug treatment and plasmids

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
Actions Inhibitor
CAS Number 422513-13-1
Applications Aurora B Kinase inhibitor
Formula C29H32N4O3S
Molecular Weight 516.7
SMILES
CCS(=O)(=O)NC1=CC\2=C(C=C1)NC(=O)/C2=C(/C3=CC=CC=C3)\NC4=CC=C(C=C4)CN5CCCCC5

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO 100 mg/mL (193.55 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol Insoluble

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

In Vivo Preparation

Concentration
2.3 mg/mL
Vehicle
5% DMSO+40%PEG300+5% tween80+50% H2O

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Silke Hauf, Richard W Cole, Sabrina LaTerra, et al. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore–microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint The Journal of cell biology (2003). PMID: 12707311 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200208092 Source material
  2. [2] Stefano Santaguida, Claudio Vernieri, Fabrizio Villa, et al. Evidence that Aurora B is implicated in spindle checkpoint signalling independently of error correction The EMBO journal (2011). PMID: 21407176 DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.70 Source material
  3. [3] Zhenye Yang, Alison E Kenny, Daniela A Brito, et al. Cells satisfy the mitotic checkpoint in Taxol, and do so faster in concentrations that stabilize syntelic attachments The Journal of cell biology (2009). PMID: 19720871 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200906150 Source material
  4. [4] Wenbin Ji, Christopher Arnst, Aaron R Tipton, et al. OTSSP167 Abrogates Mitotic Checkpoint through Inhibiting Multiple Mitotic Kinases PloS one (2016). PMID: 27082996 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153518 Source material

Publications

1 publication citing this product

  1. Wenbin Ji, .et al. , PLoS One, 2016, 11(4): e0153518 PMID: 27082996

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...