Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Hyodeoxycholic acid

Cat. No. A10460 CAS 83-49-8
Hyodeoxycholic (HDCA) acid is a secondary bile acid, one of the metabolic byproducts of intestinal bacteria.

In Stock

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

Cellular target-engagement and interaction assays support a RAN-associated mechanism for HDCA: RAN thermal stability increased, while RAN/CRM1/PPARα associations decreased. A RAN triple mutant attenuated the interaction response. These experiments do not establish a binding affinity or competition with GDP/GTP. [1]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
Human Endogenous Metabolite  

Cellular Effect

Cell Line Activity Value Description Reference
CHO EC50 31.6 μM Agonist activity at human TGR5 expressed in CHO cells by luciferase assay [PMID: 18307294]
HEK-293T EC50 > 150 μM Agonist activity at VP16 tagged-VDR-LBD (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293T cells assessed as SRC1 coactivator peptide recruitment after 16 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based two hybrid assay [PMID: 26774929]
HEK-293T IC50 > 50 μM Antagonist activity against VP16 tagged-VDR-LBD (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293T cells assessed as inhibition of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced SRC1 coactivator peptide recruitment after 16 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based two hybrid assay [PMID: 26774929]
HT-29 IC50 > 80 μM Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells after 48 hrs by SRB assay [PMID: 27448915]
PC-3M IC50 > 80 μM Antiproliferative activity against human PC3M cells after 48 hrs by SRB assay [PMID: 27448915]

In Vitro Studies

In RAW264.7 macrophages, HDCA (50 or 100 μM, 24 h) increased Abca1, Abcg1 and Apoe mRNA, while Srb1 expression remained similar to vehicle. This study measured transcription rather than functional efflux by directly treated cells. [2]

RAN target engagement and export-complex interactions

Cell-based study · AML12 mouse hepatocytes and HEK293T cells expressing tagged export-complex proteins [1]

HDCA increased RAN thermal stability and reduced RAN/CRM1/PPARα associations. Probe-array screening used biotin-HDCA, whereas cellular confirmation used HDCA. The triple RAN mutant attenuated the interaction response; this is mechanistic support rather than an affinity measurement.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
RAN thermal stabilitydirectional thermal stabilization Increased after 100 μM HDCA; n = 3 biologically independent experiments[1]
Export-complex protein interactionsdirectional interaction response Reduced RAN/CRM1 and CRM1/PPARα associations; response attenuated for RAN G5A/P49A/V51A mutant[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
100 μM
Exposure duration
1 h for CETSA; 24 h for PLA; Co-IP exposure duration not specified in the read methods
Method
Cell treatment followed by CETSA, Co-IP and PLA
Vehicle
DMSO
Reported limits
No experimental Kd, binding kinetics or GDP/GTP competition established. Cell-treatment supplier not independently specified for every assay.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Hyodeoxycholic acid; Compound label in the paper: HDCA

Compound-level research evidence; supplier-specific material and Adooq lot performance are not established.

Figure 7b–c,e–g,i; Results HDCA directly binds with RAN; Methods human proteome microarray, CETSA, Co-IP, Duolink PLA

RAN thermal stability: CETSA with DMSO control; 1 h exposure — Figure 7c; Methods Cellular thermal shift assay

Export-complex protein interactions: Co-IP with input and IgG controls; PLA with DMSO control. Co-IP experiments repeated independently at least twice; PLA images from 3 biologically independent experiments, quantification n = 4–8 random fields (42–60 cells per condition). — Figure 7e–g,i; Methods Co-IP and Duolink PLA

Cholesterol-efflux gene expression in macrophages

Cell-based study · RAW264.7 mouse macrophage cell line [2]

HDCA increased Abca1, Abcg1 and Apoe mRNA after 24 h. Srb1 expression was similar between groups. These transcriptional endpoints do not themselves measure functional cholesterol efflux by directly treated cells.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Abca1, Abcg1 and Apoe mRNA versus DMSOreported relative increase At 50 μM: +57%, +54%, +106%; at 100 μM: +201%, +112%, +189%, respectively[2]
Srb1 mRNAnegative result Similar between vehicle and HDCA-treated groups[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
50 or 100 μM
Exposure duration
24 h
Method
Cell treatment in DMEM with 1% FBS
Vehicle
DMSO
Reported limits
Panel-specific biological n and error-bar definition not specified in read caption; no inferred EC50 or IC50.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Hyodeoxycholic acid; Compound label in the paper: HDCA

Compound-level research evidence; supplier-specific material and Adooq lot performance are not established.

Figure 5e; Methods Cell culture and treatment conditions and RNA Isolation and quantitative RT-PCR; Results HDCA increased expression of genes involved in cholesterol efflux

Abca1, Abcg1 and Apoe mRNA versus DMSO: qRT-PCR normalized to Rpl13a. Percentages stated in original Results; biological replicate n and error-bar definition for this panel not explicit in caption. — Figure 5e and corresponding Results paragraph

Srb1 mRNA: qRT-PCR normalized to Rpl13a. — Figure 5e and corresponding Results paragraph

In Vivo Studies

Dietary HDCA (0.625% for 8 weeks after 4 weeks of HFHS feeding) reduced hepatic triglycerides and disease scores in wild-type mice; the response was absent in global Pparα-knockout mice. This supports a PPARα requirement in this model. [1]

In female LDLR-knockout mice, 1.25% dietary HDCA for 15 weeks reduced atherosclerotic lesion size relative to chow alone. Lesions still progressed from the Western-diet baseline, and plasma triglycerides increased by 28% versus chow. [2]

Oral HDCA (50 mg/kg, three times weekly for 6 weeks) improved glucose tolerance and reduced weight gain in western-style-diet-fed wild-type mice; these benefits were absent in TGR5-knockout mice. Fasting glucose was unchanged in wild-type mice despite increased fasting insulin. [3]

PPARα-dependent hepatic response to dietary HDCA

Animal study · Male C57BL/6N wild-type and global Pparα-knockout mice; 8 weeks old at entry; HFHS diet [1]

The reduction in liver triglycerides, steatosis, inflammation and NAFLD activity score seen in wild-type mice was absent in global Pparα-knockout mice. Energy intake was not significantly changed. This genotype experiment supports a PPARα requirement under the reported conditions.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Liver triglycerides, histological scores and inflammatory cytokinesgenotype-dependent response Wild-type improvement; no significant HDCA effect in Pparα−/− mice; n = 6 per group[1]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Oral, in diet
Frequency
Dietary supplementation
Treatment course
8 weeks, beginning after 4 weeks HFHS
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
Wild-type HDCA
0.625% HDCA in diet
Wild-type HFHS diet without HDCAReduced liver TG, steatosis, inflammation and NAFLD activity score; n = 6 per group.[1]
Pparα-knockout HDCA
0.625% HDCA in diet
Pparα−/− HFHS diet without HDCANo significant reduction in liver TG, steatosis, inflammation, NAFLD activity score or hepatic cytokines; n = 6 per group.[1]
Wild-type HDCA
Model: Male C57BL/6N wild-type
Pparα-knockout HDCA
Model: Male C57BL/6N Pparα−/−
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Hyodeoxycholic acid; Compound label in the paper: HDCA

Compound-level research evidence; supplier-specific material and Adooq lot performance are not established.

Figure 5a–h; Methods Animal studies and Animal experiment 4

Liver triglycerides, histological scores and inflammatory cytokines: Liver TG assay, histological scoring, cytokine assays and immunoblot; mean ± SEM; two-tailed Student’s t test as caption reports. — Figure 5c–h and caption; Results The anti-NAFLD effect of HDCA is hepatic PPARα-dependent

Wild-type HDCA · Figure 5a–h; Methods Animal studies and Animal experiment 4

Pparα-knockout HDCA · Figure 5a–h; Methods Animal studies and Animal experiment 4

Slower atherosclerotic lesion progression in female LDLR-knockout mice

Animal study · Female LDLR-knockout mice; Western diet for 8 weeks from age 8 weeks, followed by chow with or without HDCA for 15 weeks [2]

HDCA reduced lesion size relative to chow alone at three sites, but lesions still grew from the Western-diet baseline. Plasma triglycerides increased rather than decreased in this long-term experiment.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Atherosclerotic lesion size versus chowreported relative reduction 44%, 48%, and 94% lower at aortic root, whole aorta, and innominate artery, respectively[2]
Aortic-root lesion regression from baselinenegative result No regression in either chow or HDCA group[2]
Plasma triglycerides versus chow after 15-week interventionreported relative increase 28% increase; P < 0.05[2]
Lesion smooth-muscle-cell contentnonsignificant difference 20% versus 25% of total lesion area (HDCA versus chow); P = 0.07[2]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Oral, in diet
Frequency
Dietary supplementation
Treatment course
15 weeks after 8 weeks Western diet
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
HDCA diet after Western diet
1.25% (wt/wt) in chow
Chow without HDCA; separate Western-diet baseline groupSmaller lesions than chow, with continued progression from baseline; plasma TG increased.[2]
HDCA diet after Western diet
Model: Female LDLR-knockout mice
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Hyodeoxycholic acid; Compound label in the paper: HDCA

Compound-level research evidence; supplier-specific material and Adooq lot performance are not established.

Figure 1a–e; Table 4; Methods Animals and study design; Results HDCA inhibited atherosclerotic lesion formation

Atherosclerotic lesion size versus chow: Histomorphometry and en face analysis; Figure 1 lines/error bars mean ± SE; percentages explicitly stated in Results, not estimated from plot. — Figure 1a–c and corresponding Results paragraph

Aortic-root lesion regression from baseline: Comparison with separate baseline group euthanized after 8-week Western diet. — Figure 1a; Results lesion progression paragraph

Plasma triglycerides versus chow after 15-week intervention: Enzymatic colorimetric assay. Table 4 reports means ± SD; chow n = 12, HDCA n = 14. Not conflated with short-term cohort. — Table 4 and corresponding Results; Discussion triglyceride inconsistency paragraph

Lesion smooth-muscle-cell content: α-actin immunohistochemistry; 4–6 mice/group and 3–5 lesion sections/mouse as caption specifies. — Figure 1e; corresponding Results paragraph

HDCA diet after Western diet · Figure 1a–e; Table 4; Methods Animals and study design; Results HDCA inhibited atherosclerotic lesion formation

TGR5-dependent response to oral HDCA

Animal study · Male wild-type and TGR5-knockout mice fed western-style diet [3]

HDCA reduced body-weight gain and improved oral glucose tolerance in wild-type mice, with no corresponding benefit in TGR5-knockout mice. Wild-type fasting insulin increased while fasting glucose was unchanged.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Body-weight gain and oral glucose tolerancegenotype-dependent response Improved with HDCA in WT; no improvement in TGR5 KO[3]
Fasting glucose and insulinmixed metabolic response WT: glucose unchanged, insulin increased; TGR5 KO: no HDCA effect reported[3]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Intragastric gavage
Frequency
Three times weekly
Treatment course
6 weeks
Vehicle
Olive oil
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
Wild-type oral HDCA
50 mg/kg body weight
WT receiving olive oilReduced body-weight gain and improved OGTT; higher fasting insulin without lower fasting glucose; n = 6–10 per condition.[3]
TGR5-knockout oral HDCA
50 mg/kg body weight
TGR5 KO receiving olive oilNo corresponding HDCA benefit on weight gain or glucose tolerance; n = 5 per condition.[3]
Wild-type oral HDCA
Model: Male WT mice on western-style diet
TGR5-knockout oral HDCA
Model: Male TGR5 KO mice on western-style diet
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Hyodeoxycholic acid; Compound label in the paper: HDCA

Compound-level research evidence; supplier-specific material and Adooq lot performance are not established.

Figure 5a–c,e–h (vehicle and HDCA groups only); Results HDCA activates TGR5 in vitro and in vivo; Methods Diets and pharmacological treatments and OGTT

Body-weight gain and oral glucose tolerance: OGTT and body-weight monitoring; n = 6–10 per WT condition and n = 5 per TGR5 KO condition; mean ± SEM. Caption reports two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni for body weight and Mann–Whitney for two-group comparisons. — Figure 5a,c,e,g; Results HDCA activates TGR5 in vitro and in vivo

Fasting glucose and insulin: Fasting measurements and insulin ELISA; mean ± SEM. — Figure 5b,f and corresponding Results paragraph

Wild-type oral HDCA · Figure 5a–c,e–h (vehicle and HDCA groups only); Results HDCA activates TGR5 in vitro and in vivo; Methods Diets and pharmacological treatments and OGTT

TGR5-knockout oral HDCA · Figure 5a–c,e–h (vehicle and HDCA groups only); Results HDCA activates TGR5 in vitro and in vivo; Methods Diets and pharmacological treatments and OGTT

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
CAS Number 83-49-8
Formula C24H40O4
Molecular Weight 392.6
Synonyms 3α,6α-Dihydroxy-5 β-cholan-24-oic acid; HDCA
SMILES
C[C@H](CCC(=O)O)[C@H]1CC[C@H]2[C@@H]3C[C@H](O)[C@@H]4C[C@H](O)CC[C@]4(C)[C@H]3CC[C@]12C

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO 66 mg/mL (168.12 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol 66 mg/mL (168.12 mM)

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Zhong J, He X, Gao X, et al. Hyodeoxycholic acid ameliorates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by inhibiting RAN-mediated PPARα nucleus-cytoplasm shuttling Nat Commun (2023). PMID: 37673856 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41061-8 Source material
  2. [2] Shih DM, Shaposhnik Z, Meng Y, et al. Hyodeoxycholic acid improves HDL function and inhibits atherosclerotic lesion formation in LDLR-knockout mice FASEB J (2013). PMID: 23752203 DOI: 10.1096/fj.12-223008 Source material
  3. [3] Makki K, Brolin H, Petersen N, et al. 6α-hydroxylated bile acids mediate TGR5 signalling to improve glucose metabolism upon dietary fiber supplementation in mice Gut (2023). PMID: 35697422 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326541 Source material

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...