Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Rabusertib (LY2603618, IC-83)

Cat. No. A11036 CAS 911222-45-2

Chk inhibitor

LY2603618 is a chk2 inhibitor that binds to and inhibits the activity of chk2, which may prevent the repair of DNA caused by DNA-damaging agents.

In Stock

Publications for Rabusertib

1 publication citing this product

  1. Hayakawa K, .et al. , Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2018, Dec 2;506(4):983-989 PMID: 30404732

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

In AML models, LY2603618 induced DNA damage measured by alkaline comet assays. Partial protection by roscovitine supports a CDK-dependent contribution, while leaving room for additional mechanisms. These cellular results do not establish a biochemical selectivity profile. [1]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
Chk1 (Cell-free assay)

Cellular Effect

Cell Line Activity Value Description Reference
CHO IC50 28.1 μM Inhibition of human ERG expressed in CHO cells at -80 mV holding potential by automated patch clamp assay [PMID: 30986571]
JeKo-1 IC50 0.92 μM Inhibition of human JeKo1 cells incubated for 72 hrs by cellTiter 96 aqueous one solution reagent based assay [PMID: 30986571]
MV4-11 IC50 0.869 μM Inhibition of human MV411 cells incubated for 72 hrs by cellTiter 96 aqueous one solution reagent based assay [PMID: 30986571]
Ramos IC50 0.539 μM Inhibition of human Ramos cells incubated for 72 hrs by cellTiter 96 aqueous one solution reagent based assay [PMID: 30986571]
RPMI-8226 IC50 4.381 μM Inhibition of human RPMI8226 cells incubated for 72 hrs by cellTiter 96 aqueous one solution reagent based assay [PMID: 30986571]
Z-138 IC50 0.368 μM Inhibition of human Z138 cells incubated for 72 hrs by cellTiter 96 aqueous one solution reagent based assay [PMID: 30986571]

In Vitro Studies

LY2603618 showed variable activity in primary AML samples tested ex vivo, with no correlation between CHK1 transcript abundance and sensitivity. In Ewing sarcoma cells, brief co-exposure to LY2603618 and gemcitabine enhanced growth inhibition and produced synergistic combination indices; non-Ewing controls were less responsive under the tested conditions. [1,2]

Variable single-agent sensitivity in primary AML samples

Cell-based study · Primary AML blast samples: 22 initial-diagnosis and 4 relapse samples, tested ex vivo [1]

LY2603618 sensitivity varied across specimens. There was no significant diagnosis-versus-relapse difference and CHK1 transcript abundance did not correlate with sensitivity. These are ex vivo observations, not patient treatment outcomes.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Metabolic viability relative to vehicle controlIC50 0.7–19.6 μM across 26 samples[1]
Diagnosis versus relapse IC50 distributionp 0.749[1]
CHK1 transcript level versus LY2603618 sensitivitySpearman correlation r = 0.164; p = 0.423; n = 26[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Variable LY2603618 concentrations; assay IC50 values are endpoints, not treatment doses.
Exposure duration
72 h
Method
MTT viability relative to vehicle control; CHK1 RT-PCR normalized to GAPDH.
Reported limits
Test material salt, analytical stereochemical confirmation and lot not specified in the reviewed material. Vehicle identity not specified in the reviewed MTT description.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: LY2603618 (rabusertib); Compound label in the paper: LY2603618

Evidence concerns the named compound in the reported models; it does not validate an Adooq lot or establish clinical efficacy.

Results: AML cells are sensitive to LY2603618; Table 1; Figure 1A–B; Methods: clinical samples, MTT, RT-PCR, statistical analysis

Metabolic viability relative to vehicle control: MTT at 72 h; each patient IC50 is mean of duplicates from one experiment because sample was limited. — Table 1; Figure 1A caption; Methods MTT

Diagnosis versus relapse IC50 distribution: Mann–Whitney two-sample U test; 22 diagnosis and 4 relapse samples. — Results first paragraph; Figure 1A; Statistical analysis

CHK1 transcript level versus LY2603618 sensitivity: Relative CHK1 transcript levels normalized to GAPDH. — Figure 1B; RT-PCR and statistical methods

DNA damage and partial protection by CDK inhibition

Cell-based study · U937 AML cells and one primary AML sample (AML#111) [1]

LY2603618 increased alkaline-comet DNA migration. Roscovitine attenuated but did not eliminate the response, supporting a partial CDK contribution. The alkaline comet endpoint is not specific for double-strand breaks.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
DNA migration in alkaline comet assayQualitative effect Increased by LY2603618 and significantly attenuated by roscovitine[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
U937: LY2603618 4 μM; AML#111: LY2603618 8 μM.
Exposure duration
16 h
Method
Alkaline comet assay; approximately 50 comets scored per gel.
Co-treatment
Roscovitine: 5 μM in U937; 10 μM in AML#111; each drug alone, combination and control.
Reported limits
Test material salt, analytical stereochemical confirmation and lot not specified in the reviewed material.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: LY2603618 (rabusertib); Compound label in the paper: LY2603618

Evidence concerns the named compound in the reported models; it does not validate an Adooq lot or establish clinical efficacy.

Figure 3C–F; adjacent Results; Methods: alkaline comet assay and Drugs

DNA migration in alkaline comet assay: Median percent DNA in tail from 4 replicate gels ± s.e.m.; Figure 3D ** p < 0.005 and *** p < 0.0005; Figure 3F ** p < 0.005. No exact bar heights extracted. — Figure 3C–F and caption; alkaline comet assay methods

Gemcitabine sensitization in Ewing sarcoma cells

Cell-based study · EW8 and A673 dose-response; EW8 and TC71 constant-ratio combination analysis; additional Ewing and non-Ewing control lines [2]

LY2603618 enhanced gemcitabine activity in brief-exposure assays. Non-Ewing control lines lacked toxicity under the tested 10 nM gemcitabine/250 nM LY2603618 schedule; U2OS clonogenic growth was not significantly inhibited by this combination. Selectivity is restricted to these conditions.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Gemcitabine dose-response with LY2603618IC50 shift ~5-fold reduction in gemcitabine IC50[2]
Constant-ratio gemcitabine/LY2603618 combination in EW8 and TC71Combination index 0.18–0.83; CI < 0.9 defined as synergism[2]
Non-Ewing control cell response to fixed combinationQualitative selectivity No toxicity reported in RPE-tert, BJ-tert, HT1080 and HEK-293T; U2OS colony effect not significant[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
LY2603618 250 nM with varying gemcitabine; fixed combination 250 nM LY2603618 plus 10 nM gemcitabine.
Exposure duration
6 h exposure; viability 42 h after drug removal; clonogenic growth approximately 10–14 days.
Method
AlamarBlue/resazurin viability and clonogenic assays; constant-ratio synergy analyzed with CompuSyn.
Vehicle
DMSO control shown in Figure 4B–C; final percentage not specified.
Co-treatment
Gemcitabine; single agents and vehicle controls.
Reported limits
Test material salt, analytical stereochemical confirmation and lot not specified in the reviewed material.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: LY2603618 (rabusertib); Compound label in the paper: LY2603618

Evidence concerns the named compound in the reported models; it does not validate an Adooq lot or establish clinical efficacy.

Figure 4B–F and adjacent Results; Methods: Chemical compounds, Cell viability, Clonogenic assay

Gemcitabine dose-response with LY2603618: Reported approximate shift, not an exact estimate read from curves; representative of two independent experiments; mean ± SD of three technical replicates. — Results adjacent to Figure 4C; Figure 4C caption

Constant-ratio gemcitabine/LY2603618 combination in EW8 and TC71: 6 h drug exposure followed by 42 h recovery; Chou–Talalay/CompuSyn. — Results adjacent to Figure 4D; Figure 4D caption; Cell viability methods

Non-Ewing control cell response to fixed combination: AlamarBlue for control panel; clonogenic validation in EW8, TC71 and U2OS. — Figure 4E–F; adjacent Results and captions

In Vivo Studies

In a TC71 Ewing sarcoma xenograft experiment, gemcitabine plus LY2603618 delayed tumor growth and prolonged time to the tumor-size humane endpoint compared with vehicle or either single agent. Tumors subsequently regrew, so the result supports a model-specific combination effect rather than durable tumor eradication. [2]

TC71 xenograft combination response

Animal study · 6-week-old female NCr nude mice bearing subcutaneous TC71 tumors; 9 mice per cohort [2]

Gemcitabine plus LY2603618 delayed tumor growth and prolonged time to the tumor-size humane endpoint compared with vehicle or either agent alone. Tumors subsequently grew; this experiment does not show durable eradication.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Tumor volume through day 10p < 0.0001 (vehicle versus combination)[2]
Time until tumor reached 20 mm in any dimensionLog-rank test P-value = 0.009 shown on survival plot[2]
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
Vehicle—Comparator for tumor growth and time to size endpoint.[2]
Gemcitabine
150 mg/kg
—Single-agent comparator; shorter time to size endpoint than combination.[2]
LY2603618
200 mg/kg
—Single-agent comparator; shorter time to size endpoint than combination.[2]
Gemcitabine plus LY2603618
Gemcitabine 150 mg/kg; LY2603618 200 mg/kg
Vehicle and both single-agent cohortsDelayed growth and prolonged time to tumor-size humane endpoint; subsequent tumor regrowth visible.[2]
Vehicle
Model: 6-week-old female NCr nude mice bearing subcutaneous TC71 tumors; 9 mice per cohort
Reported limits: Vehicle-arm composition and randomization/blinding not specified in reviewed xenograft methods.
Gemcitabine
Model: 6-week-old female NCr nude mice bearing subcutaneous TC71 tumors; 9 mice per cohort
Route: Intraperitoneal
Frequency: Once
Treatment course: Day 1
Reported limits: Vehicle-arm composition and randomization/blinding not specified in reviewed xenograft methods.
LY2603618
Model: 6-week-old female NCr nude mice bearing subcutaneous TC71 tumors; 9 mice per cohort
Route: Oral gavage
Frequency: Once daily
Treatment course: Days 1 and 2
Vehicle: LY2603618 formulated in 16% Captisol in 25 mM phosphate buffer, pH 4.
Reported limits: Vehicle-arm composition and randomization/blinding not specified in reviewed xenograft methods.
Gemcitabine plus LY2603618
Model: 6-week-old female NCr nude mice bearing subcutaneous TC71 tumors; 9 mice per cohort
Route: Gemcitabine intraperitoneal; LY2603618 oral gavage
Frequency: Gemcitabine once; LY2603618 once daily
Treatment course: Gemcitabine day 1; LY2603618 days 1 and 2
Vehicle: LY2603618 formulated in 16% Captisol in 25 mM phosphate buffer, pH 4.
Reported limits: Vehicle-arm composition and randomization/blinding not specified in reviewed xenograft methods.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: LY2603618 (rabusertib); Compound label in the paper: LY2603618

Evidence concerns the named compound in the reported models; it does not validate an Adooq lot or establish clinical efficacy.

Figure 6A–B; adjacent Results; Methods: Xenograft and Statistical analysis

Tumor volume through day 10: Two-way ANOVA; mean ± SD tumor volumes; curves truncated as mice reached size endpoint. — Figure 6A caption

Time until tumor reached 20 mm in any dimension: Kaplan–Meier; log-rank (Mantel–Cox). Plot labels no specific pairwise comparison; no median survival values inferred. — Figure 6B image/caption; Xenograft methods

Vehicle · Figure 6 and caption; Xenograft methods

Gemcitabine · Figure 6 and caption; Xenograft methods

LY2603618 · Figure 6 and caption; Xenograft methods

Gemcitabine plus LY2603618 · Figure 6 and caption; Xenograft methods

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
Actions Inhibitor
CAS Number 911222-45-2
Applications Chk inhibitor
Formula C18H22BrN5O3
Molecular Weight 436.3
Synonyms LY-2603618; IC-83
SMILES
CC1=CC(=C(C=C1Br)NC(=O)NC2=NC=C(N=C2)C)OC[C@@H]3CNCCO3

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO 12 mg/mL (27.5 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol Insoluble

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

In Vivo Preparation

Concentration
28 mg/mL
Vehicle
2% DMSO+30% PEG400+0.5% Tween80+5% Propylene glycol

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Jianyun Zhao, Xiaojia Niu, Xinyu Li, et al. Inhibition of CHK1 enhances cell death induced by the Bcl-2-selective inhibitor ABT-199 in acute myeloid leukemia cells Oncotarget (2016). PMID: 27166183 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9185 Source material
  2. [2] Kelli L Goss, Stacia L Koppenhafer, Kathryn M Harmoney, et al. Inhibition of CHK1 sensitizes Ewing sarcoma cells to the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor gemcitabine Oncotarget (2017). PMID: 29152060 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18776 Source material

Publications

1 publication citing this product

  1. Hayakawa K, .et al. , Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2018, Dec 2;506(4):983-989 PMID: 30404732

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...