Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Fenofibrate

Cat. No. A10385 CAS 49562-28-9
Fenofibrate is a drug of the fibrate class. It is mainly used to reduce cholesterol levels in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease.

In Stock

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

Fenofibrate increases PPARα-dependent transcription in a cellular reporter system. In COS-7 cells expressing human PPARα, FABP2 enhanced the fenofibrate response, whereas FABP1 did not significantly enhance it. This is functional cellular evidence rather than a direct receptor-binding potency measurement. [1]

Fenofibrate also has a PPARα-independent component of action in LN-229 glioblastoma cells: acute oxygen-consumption inhibition persisted after PPARα knockdown or antagonist pretreatment. This finding is limited to the acute mitochondrial response tested. [2]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
PPARα

Cellular Effect

Cell Line Activity Value Description Reference
A549 IC50 15.9 μM Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 120 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 16680159]
COS-1 EC50 > 5000 nM Agonist activity at human PPARgamma receptor expressed in african green monkey COS1 cells co-transfected with fused yeast Gal4-DBD by transactivation assay [PMID: 19530681]
COS-1 EC50 2000 nM Agonist activity at human PPARalpha receptor expressed in african green monkey COS1 cells co-transfected with fused yeast Gal4-DBD by transactivation assay [PMID: 19530681]
HEK293 EC50 33.51 μM Agonist activity at human PPARalpha expressed in HEK293 cells cotransfected with PPREx4-TK-luc assessed as activation of luciferase activity measured after 48 hrs by transactivation assay [PMID: 23265844]
HepG2 EC50 50 μM Transactivation of human GAL4-fused PPARalpha LBD expressed in human HepG2 cells after 24 hrs by renilla luciferase reporter gene assay [PMID: 31320147]
LoVo IC50 13.2 μM Antiproliferative activity against human LoVo cells after 120 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 16680159]
MIA PaCa-2 IC50 8.4 μM Antiproliferative activity against human MIAPaCa2cells after 120 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 16680159]
PC-3 IC50 18 μM Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells after 120 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 16680159]
U-87MG ATCC IC50 74.5 μM Antiproliferative activity against human U87MG cells after 120 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 16680159]

9 records · Scroll to view more

In Vitro Studies

In a glial-cell comparison, 50 μM fenofibrate for 72 h produced greater cell death in glioblastoma models than in normal human astrocytes. Normal astrocytes nevertheless showed cell death and acute respiration inhibition, so these experiments demonstrate relative susceptibility rather than complete tumor specificity. [2]

PPARα reporter activation depends on FABP context

Cell-based study · COS-7 cells transfected with human PPARα, PPRE3-TK-LUC and β-galactosidase, with empty vector, FABP1 or FABP2 [1]

Fenofibrate increased reporter activity in PPARα-expressing cells. FABP2 enhanced this response; FABP1 did not significantly enhance it. The separate fenofibric-acid comparator showed a different FABP dependence. Ligands had no effect without PPARα.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
PPARα reporter activity following fenofibrateFold activation 10-fold increase with PPARα and empty vector; a further 1.6-fold increase with FABP2; no significant further increase with FABP1[1]
Separate fenofibric-acid reporter comparatorFold activation 7-fold increase with PPARα and empty vector; 1.7-fold further increase with FABP1; no significant further increase with FABP2[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
50 μM fenofibrate; separate comparator: 50 μM fenofibric acid
Exposure duration
24 h treatment, starting 24 h after transfection
Method
Luciferase activity normalized using β-galactosidase; compared with vehicle and no-FABP/empty-vector controls
Vehicle
0.1% v/v DMSO
Co-treatment
No drug combination; FABP1 or FABP2 co-expression was an experimental factor.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Fenofibrate; Compound label in the paper: Fenofibrate

Evidence applies to the paper’s tested fenofibrate material and models; no equivalence to a particular Adooq lot is established.

Figure 5B–C,E and caption; Results: ligand-dependent PPARα transcription; Experimental Procedures: PPARα luciferase reporter assay and Materials

PPARα reporter activity following fenofibrate: Values described in Results; Figure 5 shows mean ± S.E. from four independent experiments; *p < 0.05 versus PPARα alone. No exact error values inferred from bars. — Figure 5B–C,E and caption; Results: ligand-dependent PPARα transcription; Experimental Procedures: PPARα luciferase reporter assay and Materials

Separate fenofibric-acid reporter comparator: Distinct acid comparator at 50 μM for 24 h in the same reporter design; not a fenofibrate potency value. — Figure 5B–C,E and caption; Results: ligand-dependent PPARα transcription; Experimental Procedures: PPARα luciferase reporter assay and Materials

Acute respiration inhibition persists after PPARα perturbation

Cell-based study · LN-229 human glioblastoma cells with PPARα-targeting or scrambled siRNA, or GW6471 pretreatment [2]

Acute fenofibrate addition reduced oxygen consumption despite PPARα knockdown or antagonist pretreatment. These controls support a PPARα-independent component of the acute mitochondrial response, without establishing that every later fenofibrate effect is receptor-independent.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Acute oxygen consumption after fenofibrateQualitative OCR response OCR decreased in both PPARα-siRNA and scrambled-siRNA cultures and after GW6471 pretreatment[2]
Validation of PPARα knockdownmRNA reduction >5-fold decrease in PPARα mRNA compared with mock-treated and scrambled-siRNA controls[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
50 μM fenofibrate; pretreatment: 100 nM PPARα-targeting siRNA or scrambled siRNA, or 1 μM GW6471
Exposure duration
48 h pretreatment followed by acute fenofibrate injection and real-time flux monitoring
Method
Extracellular flux OCR/ECAR assay; PPARα mRNA knockdown checked by qPCR
Vehicle
DMSO; matching DMSO and scrambled-siRNA controls
Co-treatment
Fenofibrate tested after PPARα knockdown or GW6471 pretreatment; antagonist-alone controls included.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Fenofibrate; Compound label in the paper: FF

Evidence applies to the paper’s tested fenofibrate material and models; no equivalence to a particular Adooq lot is established.

Figure 7A–B and caption; Results paragraph beginning “To verify further”; Materials and methods: Cell culture and Evaluation of metabolic parameters

Acute oxygen consumption after fenofibrate: Figure 7A–B: mean ± SD from two separate experiments in triplicate (n=6); caption marks DMSO-versus-FF differences, P ≤ 0.05 explicitly in A. No exact OCR values read from curves. — Figure 7A–B and caption; Results paragraph beginning “To verify further”; Materials and methods: Cell culture and Evaluation of metabolic parameters

Validation of PPARα knockdown: qPCR normalized to GAPDH; Results reports >5-fold, not an exact curve-derived value. — Figure 7A lower histogram and associated Results paragraph

Glial cell comparison shows relative, incomplete selectivity

Cell-based study · LN-229 and U-87MG human glioblastoma cell lines, primary human GBM cells and normal human astrocytes (NHA) [2]

After fenofibrate exposure, glioblastoma models showed greater cell death than NHA, but NHA were not unaffected. Acute respiration inhibition also occurred in every tested cell type.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
7-AAD-positive cell death after 50 μM fenofibrate for 72 hPercent 7-AAD-positive cells NHA 22%; LN-229 81%; U-87MG 82%; primary human GBM cells 73%[2]
Acute OCR across normal and malignant glial modelsQualitative OCR response All tested models, including NHA, showed a rapid OCR decline[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
25 or 50 μM fenofibrate for cell-death comparison; 50 μM for acute respiration traces
Exposure duration
72 h for cell death; separate acute OCR monitoring
Method
Flow cytometry using 7-AAD positivity; accompanying extracellular flux measurements
Vehicle
DMSO controls in corresponding growth media; DMSO in XF medium for acute OCR
Reported limits
The primary-cell comparison does not establish population-wide human response or clinical selectivity. Replicate n is assay replication, not a number of patients.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Fenofibrate; Compound label in the paper: FF

Evidence applies to the paper’s tested fenofibrate material and models; no equivalence to a particular Adooq lot is established.

Figure 9A–E and caption; Results: Glioblastoma cells and normal astrocytes differ in sensitivity to FF; Materials and methods: Cell culture, metabolic parameters and cell death assay

7-AAD-positive cell death after 50 μM fenofibrate for 72 h: Percentages from Results text; Figure 9E caption: average values from three experiments performed in triplicate (n=9). No exact error values or vehicle-adjusted changes inferred. — Figure 9E and caption; corresponding glial sensitivity Results paragraph

Acute OCR across normal and malignant glial models: Mean ± SD; three experiments in triplicate (n=9); no absolute OCR values inferred. — Figure 9A–D and caption; glial sensitivity Results paragraph

In Vivo Studies

In mice treated with fenofibrate by oral gavage for 14 days, hepatic Cyp4a10 and Cyp4a14 induction occurred in wild-type and floxed controls but was absent in whole-body and hepatocyte-specific PPARα knockouts. These results support a hepatocyte PPARα-dependent transcriptional response; the dosing amount was not verified from the inaccessible supplementary protocol. [3]

Hepatic transcriptional response requires hepatocyte PPARα

Animal study · Wild-type, floxed Pparαhep+/+, whole-body Pparα−/− and hepatocyte-specific Pparαhep−/− mice [3]

Fenofibrate strongly induced hepatic Cyp4a10 and Cyp4a14 in wild-type and floxed controls; whole-body and hepatocyte-specific PPARα knockouts were unresponsive. The associated liver transcriptome supported a predominantly hepatocyte-autonomous response.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Hepatic Cyp4a10 and Cyp4a14 mRNA responseQualitative genotype-dependent response Strong induction in WT and floxed controls; absent response in whole-body and hepatocyte-specific PPARα knockouts[3]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Oral gavage
Treatment course
14 days
Vehicle
Vehicle control; composition not verified
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
Fenofibrate versus vehicle across four PPARα genotypesVehicle-treated mice within genotype; WT and floxed mice are receptor-competent comparators for the two knockout genotypes.Fenofibrate strongly induced hepatic Cyp4a10 and Cyp4a14 in wild-type and floxed controls; whole-body and hepatocyte-specific PPARα knockouts were unresponsive. The associated liver transcriptome supported a predominantly hepatocyte-autonomous response.[3]
Fenofibrate versus vehicle across four PPARα genotypes
Model: Wild-type, floxed Pparαhep+/+, whole-body Pparα−/− and hepatocyte-specific Pparαhep−/− mice
Reported limits: Dose, gavage vehicle composition, dosing frequency and sample number for Figure 2 were not verified from the inaccessible supplement; n=8 in Figure 1 is not transferred to Figure 2.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Fenofibrate; Compound label in the paper: Fenofibrate

Evidence applies to the paper’s tested fenofibrate material and models; no equivalence to a particular Adooq lot is established.

Figure 2A–C and caption; Results: Hepatocyte-autonomous effect of fenofibrate on PPARα activity; Figure 1 and knockout validation text; Materials and methods

Hepatic Cyp4a10 and Cyp4a14 mRNA response: qRT-PCR; mean ± SEM; caption reports **p≤0.01 and ***p≤0.005. No exact fold values or sample number inferred from the figure. — Figure 2A–B and caption; hepatocyte-autonomous response Results

Fenofibrate versus vehicle across four PPARα genotypes · Figure 2A–C and caption; Results: Hepatocyte-autonomous effect of fenofibrate on PPARα activity; Figure 1 and knockout validation text; Materials and methods

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
CAS Number 49562-28-9
Formula C20H21ClO4
Molecular Weight 360.83
Synonyms Tricor; Procetofen; Controlip; durafenat; LF-178; Lipanthyl; Normalip; Secalip
SMILES
CC(C)(OC1=CC=C(C(C2=CC=C(Cl)C=C2)=O)C=C1)C(OC(C)C)=O

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO 67 mg/mL (185.67 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol 43 mg/mL (119.17 mM)

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

In Vivo Preparation

Concentration
9 mg/mL
Vehicle
2% DMSO+40% PEG 300+2% Tween 80+ddH2O

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Hughes ML, Liu B, Halls ML, et al. Fatty Acid-binding Proteins 1 and 2 Differentially Modulate the Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor α in a Ligand-selective Manner The Journal of biological chemistry (2015). PMID: 25847235 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.605998 Source material
  2. [2] Wilk A, Wyczechowska D, Zapata A, et al. Molecular mechanisms of fenofibrate-induced metabolic catastrophe and glioblastoma cell death Molecular and cellular biology (2015). PMID: 25332241 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00562-14 Source material
  3. [3] Montagner A, Polizzi A, Fouché E, et al. Liver PPARα is crucial for whole-body fatty acid homeostasis and is protective against NAFLD Gut (2016). PMID: 26838599 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310798 Source material

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...