Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Ostarine (MK-2866, GTx-024)

Androgen Receptor Modulators

Ostarine is an androgen receptor modulator (SARM)

Out of Stock

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

Ostarine (enobosarm, GTx-024) activates androgen-receptor-dependent transcription. In an AR-transfected MDA-MB-231 reporter assay, GTx-024 had an EC50 of 1 nM. This functional cellular endpoint is distinct from receptor-binding affinity. [1]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

In Vitro Studies

GTx-024 reduced cell numbers after six days in MDA-MB-231 breast-cancer cells engineered to overexpress AR. Bicalutamide did not inhibit growth in this experiment. The result is specific to this engineered model. [1]

In 24-hour myoblast experiments, ostarine increased BrdU incorporation at 1000 nM in C2C12 cells and at 1000–10,000 nM in L6 cells. MTT responses varied with model and concentration. These cellular findings do not establish whole-muscle hypertrophy. [2]

AR-dependent transcriptional activation

Cell-based study · Human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells transiently expressing human androgen receptor and GRE-luciferase reporter. [1]

GTx-024 acted as an AR agonist in this cellular reporter system. The inactive GTx-024R comparator lacked the reporter response seen with GTx-024; DHT was an active comparator. This is a functional transcriptional endpoint, not a binding constant.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
AR-dependent transactivationEC50 1 nM[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Concentration-response series shown in Figure 1A (nM); Table 1 reports an AR-transactivation EC50 of 1 nM.
Exposure duration
Treatment 24 h after transfection; luciferase measured 48 h after transfection.
Method
AR-dependent GRE-luciferase reporter assay in MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with human AR and a renilla control.
Co-treatment
Comparator ligands were tested separately; no combination effect is claimed.
Reported limits
Treatment solvent not specified in the relevant transactivation methods. Renilla plasmid amounts differ between general methods and Figure 1A caption; these amounts are not reproduced here. Table 1 does not give an uncertainty for the reporter EC50.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Ostarine (enobosarm, GTx-024, MK-2866); Compound label in the paper: GTx-024

Applies to the named research compound in this reporter assay; no Adooq lot or enantiomeric-purity validation.

Figure 1A; Table 1 GTx-024 row; Methods: Transfection and transactivation assay; Statistical analysis

AR-dependent transactivation: GRE-luciferase with human AR; Table 1 reports EC50 without an uncertainty. nM context is supplied by the linked Figure 1A concentration axis. — Table 1, GTx-024 row and footnote; Figure 1A concentration axis

Growth response in an engineered AR-positive breast-cancer model

Cell-based study · Human MDA-MB-231 breast-cancer cells stably overexpressing wild-type AR (MDA-MB-231-AR). [1]

GTx-024 reduced cell numbers in the six-day experiment; DHT and GTx-027 also inhibited growth, whereas bicalutamide did not. This engineered model does not establish a response in all AR-positive or all triple-negative breast cancers.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Cell number after six daysdirection Reduced with GTx-024; bicalutamide did not inhibit growth.[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
0.1, 1, 10, 100 and 1000 nM GTx-024, with a zero-concentration control (Figure 1E).
Exposure duration
6 days
Method
Coulter-counter cell enumeration after treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells stably overexpressing AR.
Co-treatment
DHT, GTx-027 and bicalutamide were separate comparator treatments.
Reported limits
Treatment solvent and medium-renewal schedule for this six-day assay are not specified in the acquired relevant text. Numeric growth IC50 from Table 1 is not used because its assay cross-reference is ambiguous.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Ostarine (enobosarm, GTx-024, MK-2866); Compound label in the paper: GTx-024

Restricted to the AR-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 model and this six-day endpoint.

Figure 1E and caption; Results: AR agonists inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation; Methods: Cell culture and Statistical analysis

Cell number after six days: Direct cell counts; plotted means ± SE. General statistical methods report triplicate in vitro experiments; precise independent-repeat count for panel E is not separately identified. — Figure 1E and caption; Results paragraph beginning MDA-MB-231 cells were stably transfected

Proliferation and metabolic activity in two myoblast lines

Cell-based study · Mouse C2C12 and rat L6 myoblast cell lines from ECACC. [2]

After 24 h, ostarine increased BrdU incorporation at 1000 nM in C2C12 cells and at 1000 and 10,000 nM in L6 cells. MTT responses differed by cell line and concentration. MTT is a metabolic assay and does not alone establish increased cell survival.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
BrdU incorporationsignificance C2C12: increased at 1000 nM (p < 0.01). L6: increased at 1000 nM (p < 0.01) and 10,000 nM (p < 0.05), versus corresponding control.[2]
MTT absorbancesignificance C2C12: increased at 1000 nM (p < 0.05). L6: increased at 10 nM (p < 0.05) and 100, 1000 and 10,000 nM (p < 0.01), versus corresponding control.[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
1, 10, 100, 1000 and 10,000 nM ostarine.
Exposure duration
24 h; BrdU was present during the final 3 h.
Method
BrdU incorporation and MTT absorbance in serum-free experimental DMEM containing 0.2% BSA.
Reported limits
Treatment stock solvent is not specified in the read cell methods. DMSO is described for dissolution of MTT formazan after incubation, not as the treatment vehicle. Caption n = 9 combines n = 3 per group across 3 repetitions; independent biological replicate structure is not established.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Ostarine (enobosarm, GTx-024, MK-2866); Compound label in the paper: Ostarine

Named-compound results in cultured myoblasts; no equivalence to an Adooq batch, whole-muscle hypertrophy or clinical benefit.

Results 2.1; Figure 1A–D and caption; Methods 4.3, 4.4 and 4.6

BrdU incorporation: 24-h treatment; BrdU added after 21 h for 3 h. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett test; mean ± SEM, caption n = 9 (n = 3 per group, 3 repetitions). — Results 2.1; Figure 1A,C and caption; Methods 4.6

MTT absorbance: MTT after 24-h exposure; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett test; mean ± SEM, caption n = 9 (n = 3 per group, 3 repetitions). — Results 2.1; Figure 1B,D and caption; Methods 4.6

In Vivo Studies

Five weeks of dietary ostarine increased selected muscle capillary-to-fiber ratios in ovariectomized rats. Responses differed by muscle, dose and comparator: soleus capillaries and muscle-fiber size were not significantly changed. Body-weight-normalized muscle weights were not significantly increased, while the intermediate and high doses increased uterine weight. [3]

Muscle vascularization and limits of tissue selectivity in OVX rats

Animal study · Three-month-old female Sprague-Dawley rats, OVX or intact. Allocated groups: Non-OVX n = 12, OVX n = 12, each of three OS groups n = 13. [3]

Ostarine increased selected gastrocnemius and longissimus capillary-to-fiber ratios, with dose- and comparator-specific significance. Soleus capillaries and muscle-fiber size were not significantly changed. Higher doses increased uterine weight; body-weight-normalized muscle weights were not significantly increased.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Capillary-to-muscle-fiber ratiopairwise direction Gastrocnemius: all OS groups > Non-OVX; 0.04 and 4 groups > OVX. Longissimus: 0.4 and 4 groups > Non-OVX and OVX. Soleus: no OS effect reported. Significant comparisons p < 0.05.[3]
Muscle-fiber size and distributiondirection No significant OS-associated change in fiber area/diameter versus Non-OVX or OVX across the studied muscles; longissimus fiber-type distribution did not differ.[3]
Uterine weightpairwise direction Nominal 0.4 and 4 mg/kg/day groups > OVX and 0.04 group (p < 0.05); 0.04 group did not differ from OVX. All OVX groups remained below intact Non-OVX.[3]
Body-weight-normalized muscle weightdirection Muscle-weight effects were not significant after correction by body weight.[3]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Oral, incorporated in soy-free diet; ad libitum feeding.
Frequency
Diet supplied throughout treatment; intake estimated from cage food consumption and body weight weekly.
Treatment course
5 weeks, beginning 8 weeks after ovariectomy.
Vehicle
Soy-free rodent diet (ssniff); no injection solvent.
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
OVX+OS 0.04
Nominal 0.04 mg/kg body weight/day; estimated daily uptake 0.03 ± 0.006 mg/kg body weight (mean ± SD).
Untreated OVX (allocated n = 12) and intact Non-OVX (allocated n = 12), receiving soy-free diet.Gastrocnemius capillary-to-fiber ratio higher than both untreated OVX and Non-OVX. No fiber-size hypertrophy demonstrated; uterine weight did not differ from untreated OVX.[3]
OVX+OS 0.4
Nominal 0.4 mg/kg body weight/day; estimated daily uptake 0.3 ± 0.07 mg/kg body weight (mean ± SD).
Untreated OVX (allocated n = 12) and intact Non-OVX (allocated n = 12), receiving soy-free diet.Longissimus capillary-to-fiber ratio higher than both untreated OVX and Non-OVX. Gastrocnemius ratio higher than Non-OVX, without the significant OVX comparison reported for low/high groups. Uterine weight increased versus OVX and low-dose OS.[3]
OVX+OS 4
Nominal 4 mg/kg body weight/day; estimated daily uptake 3.0 ± 0.83 mg/kg body weight (mean ± SD).
Untreated OVX (allocated n = 12) and intact Non-OVX (allocated n = 12), receiving soy-free diet.Gastrocnemius and longissimus capillary-to-fiber ratios higher than untreated OVX and Non-OVX. No fiber-size hypertrophy demonstrated. Uterine weight increased versus OVX and low-dose OS.[3]
OVX+OS 0.04
Model: OVX female Sprague-Dawley rats; allocated n = 13 for this treatment group.
Reported limits: Individual daily exposure was not measured; estimated uptake uses mean cage intake and body weight. Outcome-specific sample loss is not individually enumerated in the selected caption.
OVX+OS 0.4
Model: OVX female Sprague-Dawley rats; allocated n = 13 for this treatment group.
Reported limits: Individual daily exposure was not measured; estimated uptake uses mean cage intake and body weight. Outcome-specific sample loss is not individually enumerated in the selected caption.
OVX+OS 4
Model: OVX female Sprague-Dawley rats; allocated n = 13 for this treatment group.
Reported limits: Individual daily exposure was not measured; estimated uptake uses mean cage intake and body weight. Outcome-specific sample loss is not individually enumerated in the selected caption.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Ostarine (enobosarm, GTx-024, MK-2866); Compound label in the paper: Ostarine (OS)

Five-week tissue/histology findings in estrogen-deficient female rats; no human efficacy or generalized absence of androgenic effects.

Experiment I; Figure 3; Table 1; General Procedures; Microscopy and Analysis of Muscles; Statistical Analysis

Capillary-to-muscle-fiber ratio: Amylase-PAS-stained sections; ratio counted in two randomly selected fields per muscle. Figure 3 calls this capillary density; it is a ratio, not capillaries per area. Mean ± SD, Tukey comparisons. — Experiment I: Vascularization of Muscles; Figure 3 and caption; Microscopy and Analysis of Muscles

Muscle-fiber size and distribution: ATPase-stained sections with morphometric analysis; reported group comparisons, not an equivalence test. — Experiment I: Muscle Fiber Size and Distribution; Table 1; Microscopy and Analysis of Muscles

Uterine weight: Uterus weighed at study end. Reused cohort measurement explicitly attributed by the paper to earlier publications 32 and 33. — Experiment I: Uterine Weight; Table 1 and Tukey footnotes

Body-weight-normalized muscle weight: Gastrocnemius and soleus weights with body-weight correction; no claim of improved force or functional performance. — Experiment I: Muscle Weight; Table 1

OVX+OS 0.04 · Methods: General Procedures; Results Experiment I: OS Dosage and Food Intake, Uterine Weight, Vascularization of Muscles; Figure 3; Table 1

OVX+OS 0.4 · Methods: General Procedures; Results Experiment I: OS Dosage and Food Intake, Uterine Weight, Vascularization of Muscles; Figure 3; Table 1

OVX+OS 4 · Methods: General Procedures; Results Experiment I: OS Dosage and Food Intake, Uterine Weight, Vascularization of Muscles; Figure 3; Table 1

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
Actions Modulator
CAS Number 841205-47-8
Applications Androgen Receptor Modulators
Formula C19H14F3N3O3
Molecular Weight 389.3
SMILES
C[C@](COC1=CC=C(C=C1)C#N)(C(=O)NC2=CC(=C(C=C2)C#N)C(F)(F)F)O

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO 73 mg/mL (187.5 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol 73 mg/mL (187.5 mM)

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

In Vivo Preparation

Concentration
4 mg/mL
Vehicle
1% DMSO+30% polyethylene glycol+1% Tween 80

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Ramesh Narayanan, Sunjoo Ahn, Misty D. Cheney, et al. Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) Negatively Regulate Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Growth and Epithelial:Mesenchymal Stem Cell Signaling PLoS ONE (2014). PMID: 25072326 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103202 Source material
  2. [2] Natalia Leciejewska, Paweł A. Kołodziejski, Maciej Sassek, et al. Ostarine-Induced Myogenic Differentiation in C2C12, L6, and Rat Muscles International Journal of Molecular Sciences (2022). PMID: 35457222 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23084404 Source material
  3. [3] Paul Jonathan Roch, Danny Henkies, Jan Christoph Carstens, et al. Ostarine and Ligandrol Improve Muscle Tissue in an Ovariectomized Rat Model Frontiers in Endocrinology (2020). PMID: 33042018 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.556581 Source material

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...