Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Tideglusib

Cat. No. A11592 CAS 865854-05-3

GSK-3 Inhibitor

Tideglusib is a GSK-3 inhibitor currently in phase II clinical trials for the treatment of Alzheimer disease and progressive supranuclear palsy

In Stock

Publications for Tideglusib

1 publication citing this product

  1. Vijaya Bharti, .et al. , Cell Rep, 2022, Dec 20;41(12):111826 PMID: 36543138

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

Tideglusib inhibits human GSK-3β in a time-dependent manner. In a Z′-LYTE assay, the reported IC50 was 105 nM without preincubation and 5 nM after 1 h preincubation. Inhibition persisted after removal of unbound drug, supporting functional irreversibility within the experimental observation window. [1]

Measured inhibition depends on assay conditions. An independent PhosphoSens assay reported IC50 values of 1780 nM without preincubation and 139 nM after 3 h preincubation. At a fixed 10 μM Tideglusib concentration, 2 mM DTT, GSH or TCEP markedly reduced inhibition. These results should not be collapsed into a single universal potency value. [2]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
GSK-3β(WT) IC50 5 nM
GSK-3β(C199A) IC50 60 nM

In Vitro Studies

In ALS-derived lymphoblast cell lines, 5 μM Tideglusib for 24 h reduced elevated TDP-43 phosphorylation and cytosolic accumulation. Western blotting showed a trend toward restoration of nuclear TDP-43, and microscopy supported redistribution. These peripheral cell-line findings do not establish a clinical response or efficacy in motor neurons. [3]

In a separate SH-SY5Y assay, 10 μM Tideglusib for 24 h did not increase nuclear β-catenin, whereas the comparator SB216763 did. Thus, β-catenin responses should be interpreted in the specific model and treatment context. [3]

Preincubation-dependent inhibition of human GSK-3β

Biochemical assay · Human recombinant wild-type GSK-3β; Z′-LYTE peptide phosphorylation assay [1]

A 1-h enzyme–drug preincubation shifted the reported IC50 from 105 to 5 nM. These are assay endpoints and depend on incubation conditions.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Inhibition of wild-type GSK-3β peptide phosphorylationIC50 No preincubation: 105 (1.02) nM; 1-h preincubation: 5 (1.02) nM. Parentheses are multiplicative/divisive range factors for duplicate determinations, not ± errors.[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Serial Tideglusib dilutions; the reported IC50 values are endpoints, not selected treatment doses.
Exposure duration
With or without 1 h preincubation; 1 h enzymatic reaction
Method
FRET-based Z′-LYTE at 25 °C; enzyme 2–5 nM; ATP 12.5 μM and Ser/Thr-9 peptide 2 μM.
Vehicle
1% DMSO
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Tideglusib; Compound label in the paper: Tideglusib

Research evidence for the reported tested material and model; no supplier-lot equivalence or clinical efficacy is established.

Experimental Procedures: Enzymatic Assays; Results Figure 3A and Table 1

Inhibition of wild-type GSK-3β peptide phosphorylation: Table 1: mean of two independent determinations calculated in logarithmic space. Figure 3A separately shows average triplicate determinations ± S.E. — Table 1 (Tideglusib, GSK-3β WT columns); Figure 3A and caption

Persistence of inhibition after removal of unbound Tideglusib

Biochemical assay · Human recombinant wild-type GSK-3β; filtration/dilution reversibility test [1]

Inhibition persisted after removal of unbound drug by 400-fold dilution, whereas the reversible comparator SB-415286 recovered activity. This supports functional irreversibility over the observation window; this experiment alone does not establish covalent bonding.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
GSK-3β activity after two filtration/dilution cyclesActivity recovery Tideglusib inhibition persisted; SB-415286-treated enzyme recovered activity. No exact percentage inferred from the bars.[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
1 μM Tideglusib; 20 nM GSK-3β during pretreatment; SB-415286 comparator 1 μM
Exposure duration
30 min pretreatment; Results describe 1 h postdilution incubation followed by 1 h enzymatic reaction.
Method
Two filtration/dilution cycles (total 400-fold dilution of small molecules); enzymatic activity compared before and after processing.
Vehicle
1% DMSO
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Tideglusib; Compound label in the paper: Tideglusib

Research evidence for the reported tested material and model; no supplier-lot equivalence or clinical efficacy is established.

Experimental Procedures: Filtration Experiments and Enzymatic Assays; Results Figure 2 and adjacent paragraph

GSK-3β activity after two filtration/dilution cycles: Figure 2: average of three independent samples measured in duplicate; error bars S.D.; untreated enzyme processed in parallel. — Figure 2 and caption; Results paragraph beginning “Consequently, we decided to test the reversibility”

Independent assay confirms time-dependent potency

Biochemical assay · Full-length human recombinant wild-type GSK-3β; PhosphoSens peptide assay [2]

An independent assay reported IC50 values of 1780 nM without preincubation and 139 nM with 3-h preincubation. These values differ from the earlier Z′-LYTE results and must remain attached to this assay.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Inhibition of wild-type GSK-3βIC50 No preincubation: 1780 nM (95% CI 1090 to 4890); 3-h preincubation: 139 nM (95% CI 97.3 to 198).[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Serial inhibitor dilutions; IC50 endpoints reported separately.
Exposure duration
With or without 3 h preincubation; inhibition quantified after 84 min of reaction.
Method
PhosphoSens assay at 30 °C; 0.5 nM GSK-3β, 14 μM ATP, 10 μM peptide substrate.
Vehicle
1% DMSO
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Tideglusib; Compound label in the paper: Tideglusib

Research evidence for the reported tested material and model; no supplier-lot equivalence or clinical efficacy is established.

Sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.6; Section 3.4; Figure 5B and Table 1

Inhibition of wild-type GSK-3β: Curve fitting to Eq. 1; Table 1 gives 95% CIs. Figure 5 error bars are SD; n ≥ 2. Asterisk denotes no overlap of the IC50 confidence intervals. — Figure 5B and caption; Table 1 Tideglusib row and footnote; Section 2.6

Reducing agents attenuate inhibition in a single-concentration assay

Biochemical assay · Human recombinant wild-type GSK-3β; PhosphoSens peptide assay [2]

At 10 μM Tideglusib, adding 2 mM DTT, GSH or TCEP markedly reduced measured inhibition. This is a single-concentration comparison, not an IC50 measurement.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
GSK-3β inhibition with versus without reducing agentsPercent inhibition comparison Lower inhibition with each reducing agent; ***p < 0.001 by Dunnett’s test versus no reducing agent within the inhibitor group. Exact percentages are not read from the plotted points.[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
10 μM Tideglusib; 2 mM DTT, GSH or TCEP in the corresponding assay conditions
Exposure duration
84 min reaction endpoint
Method
PhosphoSens peptide phosphorylation; compare each reducing-agent condition with no reducing agent. AR-A014418 was included as an assay comparator.
Vehicle
1% DMSO
Co-treatment
Assay modifier: DTT, GSH or TCEP; no therapeutic combination.
Reported limits
Figure 6 caption reports n=2 without identifying these as independent biological experiments.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Tideglusib; Compound label in the paper: Tideglusib

Research evidence for the reported tested material and model; no supplier-lot equivalence or clinical efficacy is established.

Section 2.2 (Figure 6 exception), Section 3.5; Figure 6 and caption

GSK-3β inhibition with versus without reducing agents: Figure 6: 10 μM inhibitor; 2 mM reducing agent; SD error bars; n=2. — Figure 6 and caption; Sections 2.2 and 3.5

TDP-43 phosphorylation and localization in ALS-derived lymphoblasts

Cell-based study · Immortalized lymphoblast cell lines from sporadic ALS patients and control individuals [3]

At 5 μM for 24 h, Tideglusib reduced elevated pTDP-43 and cytosolic TDP-43 in ALS-derived lymphoblasts. The nuclear Western blot response was described as a trend toward restoration; microscopy provided additional localization evidence. These are cell-line findings, not treatment responses in patients.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
pTDP-43/total TDP-43 and subcellular TDP-43 distributionImmunoblot signal Reduced pTDP-43 and cytosolic TDP-43 in treated ALS lines versus untreated ALS lines (#p < 0.05); nuclear recovery described as a trend. No precise fold change inferred.[3]
Cytosolic/nuclear TDP-43 fluorescence distributionRelative fluorescence ratio Reduced cytosolic/nuclear TDP-43 ratio in treated ALS lines (###p < 0.001 versus untreated ALS); no exact ratio inferred from the bars.[3]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
5 μM
Exposure duration
24 h
Method
Western blotting of total and subcellular fractions; confocal TDP-43/DAPI microscopy; treated and untreated lines from both donor groups.
Reported limits
Solvent, final vehicle concentration and supplier/lot of the tested Tideglusib are not specified in the retrieved main text. No vehicle-matched solvent control is asserted.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Tideglusib; Compound label in the paper: TDG

Research evidence for the reported tested material and model; no supplier-lot equivalence or clinical efficacy is established.

Results 2.2; Figures 2–3 and captions; Methods 4.1, 4.3–4.5 and statistical analysis

pTDP-43/total TDP-43 and subcellular TDP-43 distribution: Figure 2: mean ± SEM, observations from five cell lines per group. pTDP-43 normalized to total TDP-43; cytosol and nucleus assessed with α-tubulin and Lamin B1 loading/purity controls. — Figure 2a–b and caption; Results 2.2; Methods 4.3

Cytosolic/nuclear TDP-43 fluorescence distribution: Figure 3 caption: mean ± SEM, two cell lines per donor group and at least 45 cells per individual. Methods 4.4 instead describes approximately 45 cells per group in n=2 independent experiments. The exact sampling hierarchy remains unresolved; cells are not independent donors. — Figure 3 and caption; Methods 4.4 (different sampling description retained)

No nuclear β-catenin accumulation in the tested neuroblastoma condition

Cell-based study · Human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells [3]

Tideglusib at 10 μM for 24 h did not produce nuclear β-catenin accumulation in the reported assay, whereas the ATP-competitive comparator SB216763 did. This limits a general assumption of Wnt/β-catenin activation across cell contexts.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Nuclear and cytosolic β-cateninSubcellular immunoblot signal No increase with Tideglusib in the reported condition. SB216763 increased nuclear (*p < 0.05) and cytosolic (***p < 0.001) β-catenin versus untreated cells. No exact fold change inferred.[3]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
10 μM Tideglusib; separate comparator SB216763 at 10 μM
Exposure duration
24 h
Method
Western blots of nuclear and cytosolic fractions, with Lamin B1 and α-tubulin loading/purity controls; untreated cells included.
Reported limits
Solvent, final vehicle concentration and compound lot are not specified in the retrieved main text.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Tideglusib; Compound label in the paper: TDG

Research evidence for the reported tested material and model; no supplier-lot equivalence or clinical efficacy is established.

Results 2.4; Figure 5 and caption; Methods 4.1 and 4.3; statistical analysis

Nuclear and cytosolic β-catenin: Figure 5: mean ± SEM of six different experiments; nuclear β-catenin normalized to Lamin B1, cytosolic signal to α-tubulin. — Figure 5 and caption; Results 2.4; Methods 4.3

In Vivo Studies

In a mouse molar injury model, collagen sponges loaded using 50 nM Tideglusib produced more reparative mineral at 4 and 6 weeks than sponge-alone or MTA treatment, with supporting dentine histology. The study used local pulp delivery and was neither blinded nor randomly sampled. The loading concentration is not a systemic dose or measured tissue concentration. [4]

Local Tideglusib-loaded sponge treatment in a mouse molar injury model

Animal study · CD1 wild-type mouse maxillary first molars with experimentally exposed pulp [4]

Local collagen sponges loaded using 50 nM Tideglusib were associated with more reparative mineral at 4 and 6 weeks than sponge alone or MTA. Histology supported localized reparative dentine with vital pulp. This was a composite delivery treatment, not systemic dosing or a clinical dental study.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Mineral formation at the injury site after 4 and 6 weeksMicroCT mineral analysis Higher mineralization in the drug-loaded sponge condition versus sponge alone and MTA, reported significant at both time points. Exact mineral masses are not inferred from bars.[4]
Reparative dentine and pulp morphologyHistological observation Dense dentine at the injury site after 4 weeks and repair with vital pulp after 6 weeks in the Tideglusib-loaded sponge examples.[4]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Local dental pulp contact via collagen sponge
Frequency
Single local placement at injury; no repeat administration described
Treatment course
4- and 6-week endpoints
Vehicle
Tideglusib dissolved/diluted in DMSO and delivered in Kolspon collagen sponge; DMSO percentage not specified.
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
Tideglusib-loaded collagen sponge
50 nM loading solution; delivered mass not established
Collagen sponge alone and MTA-capped injury; no explicitly concentration-matched DMSO sponge control described.Local collagen sponges loaded using 50 nM Tideglusib were associated with more reparative mineral at 4 and 6 weeks than sponge alone or MTA. Histology supported localized reparative dentine with vital pulp. This was a composite delivery treatment, not systemic dosing or a clinical dental study.[4]
Tideglusib-loaded collagen sponge
Model: CD1 wild-type mouse maxillary first molars with experimentally exposed pulp
Reported limits: Drug mass/volume delivered per tooth, final DMSO percentage, animal-level n and clustering of teeth by mouse are not reported in the retrieved repair methods. Study design gives 6–9 teeth per time point without an explicit per-group allocation.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Tideglusib; Compound label in the paper: Tideglusib

Research evidence for the reported tested material and model; no supplier-lot equivalence or clinical efficacy is established.

Results: Reparative dentine formation; Figures 3–4 and captions; Methods: Study design, Injury Protocol, MicroCT/mineral analysis, Histology

Mineral formation at the injury site after 4 and 6 weeks: Standard injury-site ROI 0.2 × 0.4 × 0.2 mm; Figure 3K–L. The caption lists Tideglusib P=0.0194 (4 weeks) and P=0.0101 (6 weeks) without separately specifying the comparator for each number; these are not assigned to a particular pairwise contrast. — Figure 3E,J,K,L and caption; Results Reparative dentine formation; MicroCT/mineral analysis

Reparative dentine and pulp morphology: Masson’s trichrome sections; descriptive morphology, not a quantitative survival endpoint. — Figure 4E,J and caption; Histology methods

Tideglusib-loaded collagen sponge · Figures 3–4; Study design; Injury Protocol; MicroCT/mineral analysis; Histology

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
Actions Inhibitor
CAS Number 865854-05-3
Applications GSK-3 Inhibitor
Formula C19H14N2O2S
Molecular Weight 334.39
SMILES
C1=CC=C(C=C1)CN2C(=O)N(SC2=O)C3=CC=CC4=CC=CC=C43

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO Warmed: 7 mg/mL (20.93 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol Insoluble

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

In Vivo Preparation

Concentration
2.3 mg/mL
Vehicle
4% DMSO+corn oil

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Domínguez JM, Fuertes A, Orozco L, et al. Evidence for irreversible inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3β by tideglusib The Journal of biological chemistry (2012). PMID: 22102280 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.306472 Source material
  2. [2] Ghazanfari D, Noori MS, Bergmeier SC, et al. A novel GSK-3 inhibitor binds to GSK-3β via a reversible, time and Cys-199-dependent mechanism Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry (2021). PMID: 33991821 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116179 Source material
  3. [3] Martínez-González L, Gonzalo-Consuegra C, Gómez-Almería M, et al. Tideglusib, a Non-ATP Competitive Inhibitor of GSK-3β as a Drug Candidate for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis International journal of molecular sciences (2021). PMID: 34445680 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22168975 Source material
  4. [4] Neves VC, Babb R, Chandrasekaran D, et al. Promotion of natural tooth repair by small molecule GSK3 antagonists Scientific reports (2017). PMID: 28067250 DOI: 10.1038/srep39654 Source material

Publications

1 publication citing this product

  1. Vijaya Bharti, .et al. , Cell Rep, 2022, Dec 20;41(12):111826 PMID: 36543138

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...