Disruption of Hsp90–Cdc37 complex formation in a purified-protein system
Biochemical assay · Purified human Hsp90α or Hsp90β with Cdc37; yeast Hsp82 also tested in pull-down assays. [1]
Celastrol reduced complex formation in GST pull-down and ELISA assays. Geldanamycin and its tested derivatives did not reproduce the disruption. Dihydrocelastrol diacetate was weaker, and premixing celastrol with DTT abolished the observed disruption. Washout experiments retained inhibition after Hsp90 pretreatment but not Cdc37 pretreatment. These assay observations do not establish a unique cellular target or a binding constant.
| Endpoint | Reported result | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Hsp90–Cdc37 complex formation | Concentration-dependent reduction; no fitted binding IC50 is supplied for the selected assays. | [1] |
| Chemical and pretreatment controls | DTT premixing blocked disruption; the modified analog was weaker. Inhibition persisted after Hsp90 pretreatment and washing, while Cdc37 pretreatment followed by washing did not inhibit subsequent binding. | [1] |
Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions
- Treatment concentration
- Pull-down: 1, 10 and 100 µM celastrol in Figure 1D human Hsp90β panel; ELISA: 1, 5, 10, 50, 100 and 200 µM in Figures 1E and 3B–C.
- Exposure duration
- Protein pretreatment: 30 min at 30 °C; subsequent Cdc37 incubation: 1 h at 4 °C in the reported binding procedures.
- Method
- Compound pretreatment before adding the binding partner; selected washout assays remove free compound before adding the partner.
- Vehicle
- DMSO control.
- Co-treatment
- DTT (1 mM) was a separate mechanistic premixing control, not a therapeutic combination.
- Reported limits
- No fitted IC50 or binding affinity; Figure 1E says triplicate experiments but does not establish independent protein preparations or define every error bar.
Methods and source locations
Compound reported in the paper: Celastrol; Compound label in the paper: cel / Cel
Evidence applies to reported parent celastrol in purified-protein assays; it does not validate an Adooq lot.
Figures 1C–E, 2A–C, 3A–C and captions; Experimental Procedures: Chemicals, GST Pull-down Assay, ELISA Microtiter Plate Assay
Hsp90–Cdc37 complex formation: GST pull-down with immunoblot detection; ELISA with bound-protein detection relative to control. — Figure 1D–E and captions; Results: Celastrol Inhibits Hsp90-Cdc37 Complex Formation
Chemical and pretreatment controls: GST pull-down; reciprocal immobilization and washout ELISA. — Figure 2A–C; Figure 3A–C and captions