Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

DMH-1

Cat. No. A12820 CAS 1206711-16-1

BMP inhibitor

DMH-1 is a selective inhibitor of the bone morphogenic protein (BMP) ALK2 receptor (IC50 = 108 nM).

In Stock

Publications for DMH-1

1 publication citing this product

  1. Teresa Rayon, .et al. , Science, 2020, Sep 18;369(6510):eaba7667 PMID: 32943498

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

DMH1 directly inhibited purified human ALK2 with a reported IC50 of 107.9 nM at 10 µM ATP. In the same limited kinase panel, no inhibition was reported for ALK5, AMPK, KDR or PDGFRβ under the tested conditions. These results support assay-specific BMP-receptor selectivity. [1]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
ALK2 107.9 nM

In Vitro Studies

In BMP4-stimulated C2C12BRA reporter cells, DMH1 reduced Id1-promoter luciferase activity, with an approximately 100 nM IC50 reported by the authors. This cellular reporter endpoint differs from purified-enzyme potency. [1]

During seven-day neural induction with 10 µM SB431542, increasing DMH1 increased SOX1-positive cells in human iPSC cultures while PAX6 expression changed little across the tested concentrations. The authors reported comparable SOX1-positive cell frequency at 5 µM DMH1 and 500 ng/mL Noggin, but substantial toxicity at 10 µM DMH1. [2]

In HeLa and MCF-7 cells, 5–10 µmol/L DMH1 reduced the 5-FU-induced LC3-II/LC3-I response. However, the authors reported no enhancement of 5-FU-mediated viability inhibition at 24, 48 or 72 hours. The LC3 readout alone does not establish autophagic flux. [3]

Purified kinase inhibition and selectivity panel

Biochemical assay · Purified human ALK2, ALK5, AMPK, KDR and PDGFRβ [1]

DMH1 directly inhibited ALK2 in the reported kinase panel. Staurosporine served as a nonspecific kinase-inhibitor control. The four other tested kinases were reported as showing no inhibition under the assay conditions; this is a limited panel, not kinome-wide selectivity.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Purified human ALK2 kinase activityIC50 107.9 nM[1]
ALK5, AMPK, KDR and PDGFRβ inhibitionReported inhibition No (each of the four targets)[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Ten concentrations by 3-fold serial dilution starting at 30 µM
Method
Radiometric kinase assay with 10 µM (33P)γATP
Reported limits
Reaction duration, assay vehicle, replicate count and IC50 uncertainty are not specified in the selected kinase methods/table.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: DMH1; Compound label in the paper: DMH-1

Evidence for the reported research material and model; does not establish equivalence of an Adooq lot or a salt formulation.

Table 2 and footnote; Methods, Kinase assay; Figure 3 and caption

Purified human ALK2 kinase activity: Radiometric kinase assay; 10 µM ATP — Table 2, DMH1 row, ALK2 column; Methods, Kinase assay

ALK5, AMPK, KDR and PDGFRβ inhibition: Same panel; maximum tested compound concentration 30 µM. Table defines “No” as no inhibition. — Table 2, DMH1 row and footnote; Methods, Kinase assay

BMP4-responsive transcriptional reporter inhibition

Cell-based study · Mouse C2C12BRA cells carrying the Id1 promoter–firefly luciferase reporter [1]

DMH1 reduced the BMP4-induced reporter signal in a concentration-dependent manner. The experiment included unstimulated and BMP4-only controls, and luciferase results were normalized to cell titers.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
BMP4-induced Id1-promoter luciferase signalIC50 Approximately 100 nM[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Figure 4b: 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 µM DMH1
Exposure duration
Overnight
Method
BMP-responsive luciferase assay normalized using Cell Titer-Glo
Co-treatment
BMP4, 50 ng/mL
Reported limits
Reporter assay vehicle, exact overnight duration, biological replicate count and error-bar definition are not specified in the selected caption/methods.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: DMH1; Compound label in the paper: DMH-1

Evidence for the reported research material and model; does not establish equivalence of an Adooq lot or a salt formulation.

Figure 4b and caption; Results paragraph beginning “Next, we examined”; Methods, BMP-responsive luciferase reporter assays; Figure 3

BMP4-induced Id1-promoter luciferase signal: Cellular reporter assay; this is not a purified-enzyme IC50 or a treatment recommendation. — Results paragraph beginning “Next, we examined”; Figure 4b; Methods, BMP-responsive luciferase reporter assays

Concentration-dependent neural precursor marker response

Cell-based study · Human induced pluripotent stem cell lines SM3 and CA6; SM3 immunocytochemistry and both lines by flow cytometry [2]

During dual-SMAD neural induction, increasing DMH1 increased SOX1-positive cells while PAX6 expression was comparatively insensitive to the concentration series. At 5 µM, SOX1-positive cell frequency was reported as comparable to Noggin (500 ng/mL). At 10 µM, the authors reported substantial toxicity with lower cell density. These are combination conditions with SB431542.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
SOX1- and PAX6-positive cell frequency at day 7Qualitative concentration response SOX1 increased with DMH1 concentration; PAX6 was not affected by the tested concentration range[2]
Cell density/toxicity during neural inductionReported limiting observation 10 µM: significant cellular toxicity manifested as much lower cell density[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
DMH1 0.5, 2, 5 or 10 µM
Exposure duration
7 days
Method
Neural induction; day-7 PAX6/SOX1 immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry
Co-treatment
SB431542 10 µM in neural induction conditions; comparator: Noggin 500 ng/mL with SB431542; mTeSR maintenance-medium control
Reported limits
Vehicle and independent replicate count for Figure 4 are not specified there. Flow methods acquired 10,000 events/sample; events are not independent biological replicates.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: DMH1; Compound label in the paper: DMH-1

Evidence for the reported research material and model; does not establish equivalence of an Adooq lot or a salt formulation.

Figure 4a–b and caption; Results paragraphs surrounding Figure 4; Methods, Neural Induction and Flow Cytometry

SOX1- and PAX6-positive cell frequency at day 7: Immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry; no exact percentages transcribed from graph. — Figure 4a–b; Results paragraphs immediately following Figure 4

Cell density/toxicity during neural induction: Author-described observation with day-7 microscopy; no numerical toxicity fraction reported in selected text. — Results paragraph immediately following Figure 4; Figure 4a

5-FU combination: LC3 response without enhanced viability inhibition

Cell-based study · Human HeLa cervical cancer and MCF-7 breast cancer cells [3]

DMH1 reduced the 5-FU-induced LC3-II/LC3-I ratio in both cell lines, but the authors reported no enhancement of 5-FU-mediated viability inhibition at 24, 48 or 72 hours. DMH1-only groups were included. Reduced LC3 ratios alone do not establish autophagic flux or a causal BMP mechanism.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
5-FU-induced LC3-II/LC3-I ratioQualitative reduction Reduced by 5 and 10 µmol/L DMH1 at 24 h; HeLa n=6, MCF-7 n=7[3]
Viability response to 5-FU with versus without DMH1Reported combination limit No enhanced inhibitory effect at 24, 48 or 72 h; n=10[3]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
DMH1 5 or 10 µmol/L; 5-FU 75 µmol/L for LC3 blots and 7.5–300 µmol/L for the viability concentration series
Exposure duration
LC3 assays: 24 h; viability assays: 24, 48 and 72 h
Method
Western blotting and MTT assay
Co-treatment
5-fluorouracil (5-FU); untreated, DMH1-only and 5-FU-only controls
Reported limits
Vehicle concentration is not specified for this experiment. n labels are retained as reported without assuming independent biological replicates.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: DMH1; Compound label in the paper: DMH-1

Evidence for the reported research material and model; does not establish equivalence of an Adooq lot or a salt formulation.

Figure 4a–d and caption; Results 3.4; Methods 2.1–2.3, 2.6 and 2.8

5-FU-induced LC3-II/LC3-I ratio: Actin-controlled Western blot; mean±SEM per Methods 2.8. Figure 4a/c show comparisons to 5-FU alone. — Figure 4a,c (image labels and caption); Results 3.4; Methods 2.8

Viability response to 5-FU with versus without DMH1: MTT; Figure 4b/d labels NS versus counterpart drug dose; mean±SEM. n experimental unit is not specified. — Figure 4b,d and caption; Results 3.4; Methods 2.3 and 2.8

In Vivo Studies

In female MMTV.PyVmT mice, six weeks of DMH1 delivery by osmotic pump reduced primary tumors larger than 0.5 cm per animal (1.92 versus 2.66 with DMSO; P=0.014) and lung metastatic foci (P=0.03; 12 mice per group). Primary tumor size was not significantly altered, as reported in the main Results. [4]

Systemic DMH1 in spontaneous mammary tumors and lung metastases

Animal study · Female FVBn MMTV.PyVmT transgenic mice with palpable spontaneous mammary tumors; 12 mice per treatment group [4]

Six-week DMH1 pump treatment reduced the number of primary tumors exceeding 0.5 cm and lung metastatic foci versus DMSO. The main Results explicitly report no significant alteration in primary tumor size. Primary-tumor and lung outcomes belong to the same treatment design.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Primary tumors >0.5 cm per animal at sacrificeTumors per animal DMH1 1.92 versus vehicle 2.66; P=0.014[4]
Lung whole-mount metastatic fociTreatment comparison Reduced with DMH1; P=0.03; n=12 mice per group[4]
Primary tumor sizeReported null result Not significantly altered[4]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Osmotic pump surgically placed into the right flank
Frequency
Six-week slow-release pump
Treatment course
6 weeks beginning after first tumor palpation (about 7 weeks of age in Figure 2 caption)
Vehicle
DMSO
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
DMSO vehicle
200 µL DMSO pump reservoir
Vehicle reference groupHigher primary-tumor number and lung metastatic burden than DMH1 group.[4]
DMH1
35 mg/mL DMH1 in a 200 µL pump reservoir
DMSO-only pumpFewer primary tumors >0.5 cm and lung metastases; primary tumor size not significantly altered.[4]
DMSO vehicle
Model: Female FVBn MMTV.PyVmT transgenic mice with palpable spontaneous mammary tumors; 12 mice per treatment group
Reported limits: Reservoir concentration is not a delivered mg/kg dose; pump flow rate, body-weight-normalized delivery, randomization and blinding are not specified in selected methods.
DMH1
Model: Female FVBn MMTV.PyVmT transgenic mice with palpable spontaneous mammary tumors; 12 mice per treatment group
Reported limits: Reservoir concentration is not a delivered mg/kg dose; pump flow rate, body-weight-normalized delivery, randomization and blinding are not specified in selected methods.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: DMH1; Compound label in the paper: DMH-1

Evidence for the reported research material and model; does not establish equivalence of an Adooq lot or a salt formulation.

Figures 2–3 and captions; Results S5–S6; Methods S12, Mice, Treatments and surgical pump implantation

Primary tumors >0.5 cm per animal at sacrifice: 12 mice/group; Figure 2 caption reports group values; plotted error bars SEM and Student’s t-test. No ± SEM values transcribed. — Figure 2d and caption; Results S5

Lung whole-mount metastatic foci: Whole-mount lung counts, with H&E confirmation; Student’s t-test, plotted error bars SEM. No exact mean inferred from bars. — Figure 3a–e and caption; Results S6; Methods S12

Primary tumor size: Main Results statement referring to Figure S3a–b; SI not retrieved, so no size values or independent visual claim extracted. — Results S5, paragraph beginning “Female mice expressing MMTV.PyVmT”; Figure S3a–b cited by authors

DMSO vehicle · Methods S12; Figures 2–3 and captions; Results S5–S6

DMH1 · Methods S12; Figures 2–3 and captions; Results S5–S6

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
Actions Inhibitor
CAS Number 1206711-16-1
Applications

BMP inhibitor

Formula C24H20N4O
Molecular Weight 380.44
SMILES
CC(C)OC1=CC=C(C=C1)C2=CN3C(=C(C=N3)C4=CC=NC5=CC=CC=C45)N=C2

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO Warmed: 21 mg/mL (55.19 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol Insoluble

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

In Vivo Preparation

Concentration
1 mg/mL
Vehicle
2% DMSO+35% PEG 300+2% Tween 80+ddH2O

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Hao J, Ho JN, Lewis JA, et al. In vivo structure-activity relationship study of dorsomorphin analogues identifies selective VEGF and BMP inhibitors ACS chemical biology (2010). PMID: 20020776 DOI: 10.1021/cb9002865 Source material
  2. [2] Neely MD, Litt MJ, Tidball AM, et al. DMH1, a highly selective small molecule BMP inhibitor promotes neurogenesis of hiPSCs: comparison of PAX6 and SOX1 expression during neural induction ACS chemical neuroscience (2012). PMID: 22860217 DOI: 10.1021/cn300029t Source material
  3. [3] Sheng Y, Sun B, Xie X, et al. DMH1 (4-[6-(4-isopropoxyphenyl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-3-yl]quinoline) inhibits chemotherapeutic drug-induced autophagy Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B (2015). PMID: 26579463 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2014.12.010 Source material
  4. [4] Owens P, Pickup MW, Novitskiy SV, et al. Inhibition of BMP signaling suppresses metastasis in mammary cancer Oncogene (2015). PMID: 24998846 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2014.189 Source material

Publications

1 publication citing this product

  1. Teresa Rayon, .et al. , Science, 2020, Sep 18;369(6510):eaba7667 PMID: 32943498

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...