Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Methscopolamine bromide

Cat. No. A10579 CAS 155-41-9
Methscopolamine bromide is a competitive antimuscarinic agent that blocks the binding of acetylcholine at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR M).

In Stock

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

Methscopolamine bromide (N-methylscopolamine bromide) bound human M3 muscarinic receptors in a CHO-membrane competition assay, with pKi 10.40±0.03 (mean±SEM; 10 experiments). This is an equilibrium binding affinity, rather than a cellular IC50. [1]

Competition kinetics at human M3 receptors yielded an unlabeled NMS association rate of 4.48±0.3 × 10^8 M−1 min−1 and dissociation rate of 0.017±0.001 min−1. These model-derived membrane-assay rates do not establish duration of action in vivo. [1]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
mAChR

In Vitro Studies

In CHO cells expressing human M1–M4 receptors, 10 μM N-methylscopolamine bromide suppressed calcium elevations persisting after xanomeline exposure and washout. Calcium signals rose again after antagonist washout at M1/M4, but not M2/M3 during the displayed interval. M2/M4 calcium responses used engineered G16 coupling; this result describes antagonism in an agonist-challenge assay. [2]

Equilibrium competition binding at human M3 receptors

Biochemical assay · Membranes from CHO cells stably expressing human M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors [1]

Unlabeled NMS displaced [3H]-NMS in an equilibrium competition assay. This is receptor binding affinity, not a functional IC50 or treatment dose.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Equilibrium affinity at human M3pKi 10.40±0.03[1]
Competition curve slopeSlope factor 0.90±0.03[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Unlabeled antagonist concentration series; approximately 350 pM [3H]-NMS tracer; 10 μg membrane protein/well
Exposure duration
18–20 h at room temperature
Method
Equilibrium radioligand competition; 1.5 ml assay volume; gentle agitation
Vehicle
Assay buffer: 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4
Co-treatment
[3H]-NMS tracer; nonspecific binding defined with 1 μM atropine
Reported limits
Exact NMS concentration series and compound stock solvent are not specified in the retrieved antagonist-Ki method paragraph; no lot stereochemical characterization supplied.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Methscopolamine bromide; Compound label in the paper: N-methylscopolamine (NMS)

Named non-radiolabeled N-methylscopolamine bromide; no isotope equivalence or salt-dose conversion assumed.

Methods: Chemicals and reagents; common binding procedures; Determination of antagonist Ki; Results Table 1 and footnote

Equilibrium affinity at human M3: Mean±SEM; n=10 experiments; Ki derived from displacement IC50 by Cheng–Prusoff correction. — Table 1, N-methyl scopolamine row and footnote

Competition curve slope: Mean±SEM; n=10 experiments. — Table 1, N-methyl scopolamine row and footnote

Competition-derived association and dissociation kinetics at human M3

Biochemical assay · Membranes from CHO cells stably expressing human M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors [1]

A competition time-course model estimated association and dissociation rates for unlabeled NMS. Rates depend on this membrane assay and fitting assumptions; they do not establish in vivo residence time or clinical duration.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Modeled association rate of unlabeled NMSkon 4.48±0.3 × 10^8 M−1 min−1[1]
Modeled dissociation rate of unlabeled NMSkoff 0.017±0.001 min−1[1]
Kinetically derived dissociation constantKd 38±1 pM (pKd 10.35)[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Unlabeled NMS at 10-, 30- and 100-fold its Ki; approximately 1 nM [3H]-NMS; 10 μg membranes/well
Exposure duration
Time course; Figure 4D displays observations through approximately 300 min
Method
Simultaneous addition of competitor and tracer; 500 μl; room temperature with gentle agitation
Vehicle
10 mM HEPES, 1 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4 assay buffer
Co-treatment
[3H]-NMS tracer; 0-competitor time course and 1 μM atropine NSB control
Reported limits
Compound stock solvent is not stated in the selected methods. No exact timepoint values inferred from curves.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Methscopolamine bromide; Compound label in the paper: N-methylscopolamine (NMS)

Named non-radiolabeled N-methylscopolamine bromide; no isotope equivalence or salt-dose conversion assumed.

Methods: competition kinetics between [3H]-NMS and unlabelled ligands; Data analysis; Results Figure 4D and caption; Table 2

Modeled association rate of unlabeled NMS: Mean±SEM over ≥4 independent experiments; each concentration time course in quadruplicate; individual-experiment concentration estimates averaged first. — Table 2, N-methyl scopolamine row; competition kinetics Results and Data analysis

Modeled dissociation rate of unlabeled NMS: Same experiment set and SEM convention as kon. — Table 2, N-methyl scopolamine row; competition kinetics Results and Data analysis

Kinetically derived dissociation constant: Derived from koff/kon; table values, not graph estimates; mean±SEM convention. — Table 2, N-methyl scopolamine row

Reversible suppression of xanomeline-associated calcium signals

Cell-based study · CHO cells stably expressing individual human M1–M4 muscarinic receptors; M2/M4 cells additionally transfected with human G16 [2]

After xanomeline exposure and washout, 10 μM NMS returned elevated calcium signals toward basal levels at M1–M4. Washing out NMS restored elevations at M1/M4, but not M2/M3 in the displayed observation interval. This is an agonist-challenge experiment in engineered cells.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Calcium response during and after NMS applicationQualitative fluorescence response NMS reduced sustained elevation to basal levels at M1–M4; after NMS washout, elevation returned at M1/M4, not M2/M3[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
10 μM NMS; 10 μM xanomeline for preceding challenge; 300 nM carbachol internal control
Exposure duration
Carbachol 5 s, then 5-min washing; xanomeline 20 s, 2-min washing; NMS 2 min, then 4-min buffer washing
Method
Fura-2 microfluorometry; normalized 340/380-nm fluorescence ratio; room temperature air-conditioned to 27°C
Vehicle
Krebs–HEPES buffer (KHB); drugs diluted directly in KHB unless stated otherwise
Co-treatment
NMS applied after xanomeline exposure and washout; carbachol stimulation served as within-cell response control
Reported limits
No NMS concentration-response curve or functional IC50 in this experiment. SI Table S6 numerical response parameters were not read or adopted.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Methscopolamine bromide; Compound label in the paper: N-methylscopolamine (NMS)

Named non-radiolabeled N-methylscopolamine bromide; no isotope equivalence or salt-dose conversion assumed.

Methods: Chemicals, Cell culture, transient transfection, Fast microfluorometry; Results: Effects of blockade of the receptor orthosteric binding site on calcium level elevated by xanomeline; Figure 4 and caption

Calcium response during and after NMS application: Representative traces averaged 8–12 best responding cells from one experiment; caption reports confirmation in 5 additional independent experiments. Cell selection limits population representativeness; no exact amplitudes estimated. — Figure 4 image/caption and adjacent Results paragraph

In Vivo Studies

In male Sprague–Dawley rats given a single 0.3 mg kg−1 subcutaneous dose of material reported as N-methylscopolamine HBr, the brain:plasma concentration ratio was 0.05 at 1 h; unbound brain:plasma and CSF:free plasma ratios were 0.02 and 0.01. These findings show low, measurable CNS exposure under the tested conditions. A single sampling time cannot establish steady-state distribution or exclude CNS activity at other doses. [3]

Low CNS distribution after a single subcutaneous dose

Animal study · Male Sprague–Dawley rats, approximately 250 g; n=3 [3]

At 1 h after a single 0.3 mg kg−1 subcutaneous dose, NMS had low but measurable brain and CSF concentrations relative to plasma. Single-time sampling does not establish steady state, absent CNS entry or a general safety advantage.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Plasma concentration at 1 hConcentration 45.9 ± 6.3 ng ml−1[3]
Brain concentration at 1 hConcentration 2.33 ± 0.92 ng g−1[3]
CSF concentration at 1 hConcentration 0.38 ± 0.25 ng ml−1[3]
CNS-to-plasma distribution ratiosDistribution ratios Brain:plasma 0.05; Kp,free 0.02; CSF:free plasma 0.01[3]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Subcutaneous
Frequency
Single administration
Treatment course
1 h to sampling
Vehicle
Saline
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
N-methylscopolamine
0.3 mg kg−1 (as reported)
Separately dosed scopolamine, 0.3 mg kg−1 subcutaneous: Table 3 brain:plasma 3.42, Kp,free 1.90, CSF:free plasma 1.13; comparative distribution control rather than vehicle efficacy controlLow but measurable CNS exposure; brain:plasma ratio 0.05 at 1 h[3]
N-methylscopolamine
Model: Male Sprague–Dawley rats, approximately 250 g; n=3
Reported limits: No steady-state, time-course or repeat-dose comparison; dose mass basis not clarified
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Methscopolamine bromide; Compound label in the paper: N-methylscopolamine (NMS)

Named non-radiolabeled N-methylscopolamine bromide; no isotope equivalence or salt-dose conversion assumed.

Methods: Materials, CNS distribution experiment, LC/MS-MS, Plasma and brain binding; Results Tables 2–3 and Figure 3; Discussion CNS penetration in vivo

Plasma concentration at 1 h: LC/MS-MS; table reports mean±SD for three separate determinations. — Table 2, N-methylscopolamine row and footnote

Brain concentration at 1 h: LC/MS-MS; mean±SD for three separate determinations. — Table 2, N-methylscopolamine row and footnote

CSF concentration at 1 h: LC/MS-MS; mean±SD for three separate determinations. — Table 2, N-methylscopolamine row and footnote

CNS-to-plasma distribution ratios: Reported ratios; Kp,free uses in vitro equilibrium-dialysis unbound fractions (Table 2: fup 0.96 ± 0.06, fub 0.40 ± 0.06). No uncertainty provided for Table 3 ratios. — Table 3, N-methylscopolamine row; Methods plasma and brain binding

N-methylscopolamine · Methods: Materials, CNS distribution experiment, LC/MS-MS, Plasma and brain binding; Results Tables 2–3 and Figure 3; Discussion CNS penetration in vivo

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
CAS Number 155-41-9
Formula C18H24NO4.Br
Molecular Weight 398.29
SMILES
C[N+]1([C@H]2CC(C[C@H]1C3C2O3)OC(=O)[C@H](CO)C4=CC=CC=C4)C.[Br-]

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO 78 mg/mL (195.83 mM)
Water 66 mg/mL (165.7 mM)
Ethanol Insoluble

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Mark R Dowling, Steven J Charlton. Quantifying the association and dissociation rates of unlabelled antagonists at the muscarinic M3 receptor British Journal of Pharmacology (2006). PMID: 16847442 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706819 Source material
  2. [2] Eva Šantrůčková, Vladimír Doležal, Esam E. El-Fakahany, et al. Long-Term Activation upon Brief Exposure to Xanomleline Is Unique to M1 and M4 Subtypes of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors PLOS ONE (2014). PMID: 24558448 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088910 Source material
  3. [3] Ernesto Callegari, Bimal Malhotra, Peter J Bungay, et al. A comprehensive non-clinical evaluation of the CNS penetration potential of antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2011). PMID: 21392072 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03961.x Source material

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...