Fig. 1 · Structure

Documents & Downloads

Resveratrol

Cat. No. A10785 CAS 501-36-0
Resveratrol has a wide spectrum of targets including cyclooxygenases(i.e. COX, IC50=1.1 μM), lipooxygenases???LOX, IC50=2.7 μM???, kinases, sirtuins and other proteins. It has anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, blood-sugar-lowering and other beneficial cardiovascular effects.

In Stock

Publications for Resveratrol

4 publications citing this product

  1. Elif Azize Ozşahin Delibaş, .et al. , Metab Brain Dis, 2025, Aug 4;40(6):246 PMID: 40760225
  2. Zeynep Kasap Acungil, .et al. , Mol Neurobiol, 2024, Sep 24 PMID: 39316354
  3. Wafa Naji Shnaikat, .et al. , Iraqi J Pharm Sci, 2023, 31(Suppl.):92-99
  4. Ha T. Tran, .et al. , PLoS One, 2017, 12(3): e0173373 PMID: 28278187

Free Aliquoting for Your Order

Tell us your preferred amount per vial. We’ll confirm the options.

Biological Activity

Bioactivity / Mechanism

Resveratrol modulates SIRT1 in a substrate-dependent manner. Labeled-p53 assays showed activation, whereas native-p53 assays did not. Fluorophore-free peptide assays independently showed activation, no effect or inhibition depending on substrate sequence; the reported SF38A-K23 activation EC50 was 22±16 μM. These results do not establish uniform SIRT1 activation in cells. [1,2]

Literature-reported observations and conditions; not Adooq-tested protocols or general treatment recommendations.

Target & Activity

Target Activity Value
SIRT1
SIRT2
Quinonereductase2 IC50 35nM-50nM
IKKβ IC50 1μM
DNApolymeraseα IC50 3.3μM
LOX IC50 3.7μM
DNApolymeraseδ IC50 5μM
COX IC50 15μM

8 targets · Scroll to view more

Cellular Effect

Cell Line Activity Value Description Reference
3T3-L1 IC50 31.4 μM Antiadipogenic activity against mouse 3T3L1 cells assessed as inhibition of differentiation after 7 days by oil-red O staining [PMID: 19757853]
518A2 IC50 > 30 μM Cytotoxicity against human 518A2 cells after 96 hrs by SRB assay [PMID: 22749392]
A253 cell line IC50 > 30 μM Cytotoxicity against human A253 cells after 96 hrs by SRB assay [PMID: 22749392]
A2780 IC50 > 30 μM Cytotoxicity against human A2780 cells after 96 hrs by SRB assay [PMID: 22749392]
A2780 IC50 48 μM Anticancer activity against human A2780 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition incubated for 24 hrs days by MTT assay [PMID: 32485531]
A2780 IC50 65 μM Anticancer activity against human A2780 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition by LDH release assay [PMID: 32485531]
A2780 IC50 74 μM Antiproliferative activity against human A2780 cells after 2 days by Alamar Blue assay [PMID: 24239390]
A-431 IC50 49.4 μM Anticancer activity against human A-431 cells assessed as reduction of cell viability incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 32485531]
A549 IC50 > 100 μM Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells assessed as cell viability after 48 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 25817772]
A549 IC50 > 30 μM Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 96 hrs by SRB assay [PMID: 22749392]
A549 IC50 10.5 μM Anticancer activity against human A549 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 32485531]
A549 IC50 119.6 μM Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 21920747]
A549 IC50 16 μM Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells assessed as decrease in cell viability after 48 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 28654265]
A549 IC50 30.4 μg/mL Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 48 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 21440448]
A549 IC50 44.7 pM Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells assessed as cell viability after 48 hrs by SRB assay [PMID: 21851083]
A549 CC50 52.6 μM Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability by Alamar blue assay [PMID: 32652408]
A549 IC50 66.25 μM Anticancer activity against human A549 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 32485531]
ASPC1 IC50 24.96 μM Anticancer activity against human ASPC1 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 32485531]
B16 IC50 14.35 μg/mL Cytotoxicity against mouse B16 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay [PMID: 18586355]
B16-F10 IC50 > 200 μM Cytotoxicity against mouse B16F10 cells assessed as suppression of cell viability after 72 hrs [PMID: 22189272]

20 records · Scroll to view more

In Vitro Studies

In IL-1β-challenged human placental explants, 200 μM resveratrol for 20 h reduced several inflammatory transcripts and secreted mediators. MCP-1 mRNA reduction was nonsignificant (P = 0.07). This was an ex vivo model using tissue from normal-glucose-tolerant pregnancies. [3]

In TNF-α-challenged human skeletal-muscle explants, resveratrol co-treatment improved insulin-signalling readouts and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. These findings describe a tissue model and do not establish prevention or treatment of gestational diabetes. [3]

Substrate-dependent SIRT1 assay response

Biochemical assay · SIRT1 deacetylation of TAMRA-p53 and unlabeled native p53 peptides [1]

HPLC product quantification showed activation with the labeled peptide, but no activation of the native p53 peptide at 30 or 100 μM; EX-527 inhibited the native-peptide reaction.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
TAMRA-p53 deacetylationEC1.5 31.6 μM[1]
Native p53 peptide deacetylationrelative activity No activation; activity within approximately 15% of DMSO control at the tested concentrations[1]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
Labeled peptide: resveratrol 0.01–600 μM; native peptide: 30 and 100 μM
Exposure duration
30 min at room temperature
Method
HPLC; 1 μM peptide, 150 μM NAD+; 5 nM SIRT1 (TAMRA) or 2.5 nM (native)
Vehicle
2% DMSO
Co-treatment
None; other compounds were separate comparators.
Reported limits
Numerical replicate count not established in the selected text; plotted error bars are SD.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Resveratrol; Compound label in the paper: resveratrol

Reported resveratrol experiments; stereochemical purity and equivalence to A10785 are not established.

Experimental Procedures: TAMRA-p53 and native-p53 HPLC assays; Results and Fig. 2C, Fig. 3C

TAMRA-p53 deacetylation: Concentration giving 50% increased enzyme activity; not EC50 or IC50. — Experimental Procedures: TAMRA-p53 and native-p53 HPLC assays; Results and Fig. 2C, Fig. 3C

Native p53 peptide deacetylation: HPLC; Fig. 3C, SD error bars; EX-527 100 μM inhibitory control. — Experimental Procedures: TAMRA-p53 and native-p53 HPLC assays; Results and Fig. 2C, Fig. 3C

Fluorophore-free peptide validation of SIRT1 modulation

Biochemical assay · Full-length human Sirt1 with SF38A-K23, DDX3X-K118 and histone H3-K116 peptides [2]

At 100 μM resveratrol, SF38A peptide deacetylation increased, DDX3X was unchanged, and H3 was inhibited. SF38A titration yielded a substrate-specific EC50.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Peptide deacetylation responsedirection SF38A-K23 activated; DDX3X-K118 unchanged; histone H3-K116 inhibited[2]
SF38A-K23 peptide deacetylation activationEC50 22±16 μM[2]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
100 μM comparison; concentration titration for SF38A
Exposure duration
Time series; product levels after 30 min or fitted deacetylation rates
Method
LC-MS; comparison: 50 μM NAD+, 5 μM peptide, 25–200 nM Sirt1 at 37°C. Titration: 500 μM NAD+ at 25°C.
Vehicle
1% (v/v) DMSO maintained in controls and titration
Co-treatment
None
Reported limits
At least three repetitions; displayed data are representative. Meaning of ± in reported EC50 not specified. Exact concentration assigned to each enzyme/peptide comparison not separately given.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Resveratrol; Compound label in the paper: resveratrol

Reported resveratrol experiments; stereochemical purity and equivalence to A10785 are not established.

Main narrative paragraph on solution validation; Fig. 1B–C; Materials and Methods: Chemicals and Mass spectrometry deacetylation assays

Peptide deacetylation response: LC-MS comparison with no enzyme, enzyme alone, and enzyme plus resveratrol in Fig. 1B. — Main narrative paragraph on solution validation; Fig. 1B–C; Materials and Methods: Chemicals and Mass spectrometry deacetylation assays

SF38A-K23 peptide deacetylation activation: Text-reported fit; Fig. 1C. ± retained without assigning SD or SEM. — Main narrative paragraph on solution validation; Fig. 1B–C; Materials and Methods: Chemicals and Mass spectrometry deacetylation assays

IL-1β-challenged human placental explants

Cell-based study · Human term placenta from normal-glucose-tolerant women undergoing elective Caesarean section; n = 6 donors [3]

Resveratrol reduced IL-1α, IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA and IL-6, IL-8 and MCP-1 release versus IL-1β alone. MCP-1 mRNA reduction did not reach significance.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Inflammatory mRNA and mediator releasecomparison IL-1α, IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA and IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1 release decreased; P<0.05 vs IL-1β[3]
MCP-1 mRNAP value P = 0.07[3]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
200 μM resveratrol; 5 ng/ml IL-1β
Exposure duration
20 h
Method
Ex vivo co-incubation; qRT-PCR normalized to B2M and 18S rRNA; ELISA corrected for total protein
Co-treatment
IL-1β challenge; basal and IL-1β-only controls
Reported limits
Vehicle and a resveratrol-only control are not specified for this experiment. Tissue viability control not located in acquired main text.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Resveratrol; Compound label in the paper: resveratrol

Reported resveratrol experiments; stereochemical purity and equivalence to A10785 are not established.

Materials and methods: Tissue collection, Tissue explants, qRT-PCR, Enzyme immunoassays, Statistical analysis; Results: placenta; Fig. 2A–G

Inflammatory mRNA and mediator release: n = 6 patients; duplicate experiments averaged per donor; mean ± SEM; Fig. 2A–C,E–G. — Materials and methods: Tissue collection, Tissue explants, qRT-PCR, Enzyme immunoassays, Statistical analysis; Results: placenta; Fig. 2A–G

MCP-1 mRNA: qRT-PCR; nonsignificant decrease, Fig. 2D. — Materials and methods: Tissue collection, Tissue explants, qRT-PCR, Enzyme immunoassays, Statistical analysis; Results: placenta; Fig. 2A–G

TNF-α-challenged human skeletal-muscle explants

Cell-based study · Rectus pyramidalis explants from term elective Caesarean donors with normal glucose tolerance; n = 6 patients [3]

Resveratrol co-treatment countered the TNF-α-associated decreases in insulin-signalling readouts and insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Insulin-signalling proteins and glucose uptakecomparison pIR-β, pIRS-1, GLUT4 and 2DG uptake increased versus TNF-α alone; P<0.05[3]

Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions

Treatment concentration
200 μM resveratrol; 10 ng/ml TNF-α
Exposure duration
20 h co-incubation, then 0.1 μM insulin for 30 min
Method
Western blot pIR-β/IR-β, pIRS-1/IRS-1 and GLUT4/β-actin; radiolabeled 2DG uptake with cytochalasin-B subtraction
Co-treatment
TNF-α challenge followed by insulin stimulation; basal and TNF-α-only controls
Reported limits
Vehicle and resveratrol-only control are not specified; no inference of direct SIRT1 causation.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Resveratrol; Compound label in the paper: resveratrol

Reported resveratrol experiments; stereochemical purity and equivalence to A10785 are not established.

Materials and methods: Tissue collection, Tissue explants, Western blotting, Glucose uptake, Statistical analysis; Results: skeletal muscle insulin signalling; Fig. 7A–D

Insulin-signalling proteins and glucose uptake: n = 6 patients, mean ± SEM; authors describe restoration to basal levels. No exact fold changes inferred from bars. — Materials and methods: Tissue collection, Tissue explants, Western blotting, Glucose uptake, Statistical analysis; Results: skeletal muscle insulin signalling; Fig. 7A–D

In Vivo Studies

In male mice treated from 12 months of age, dietary resveratrol increased remaining lifespan under high-calorie feeding, but did not extend survival or maximum lifespan under standard feeding. The high-calorie low-dose group showed a maximum-lifespan benefit; the higher-dose result did not reach significance. [4]

Diet-conditioned survival in male mice

Animal study · Male C57BL/6NIA mice treated from one year of age; standard or high-calorie diet [4]

Dietary resveratrol improved survival relative to high-calorie controls but did not increase survival or maximum lifespan under standard feeding.

Measured endpoints — not treatment concentrations
EndpointReported resultReference
Remaining lifespan on high-calorie dietreported mean increase HCLR: 26% (P = 0.005); HCR: 25% (P = 0.001)[4]
Standard-diet survival and maximum lifespancomparison No significant increase[4]
Maximum lifespan under high-calorie dietcomparison HCLR increased vs HC (P = 0.04); HCR increase did not reach significance[4]

Conditions shared by the study groups

Route
Oral, mixed into diet
Frequency
Dietary feeding
Treatment course
Beginning at 12 months of age through survival follow-up
Study groups and reported outcomes
Group / doseComparatorObserved resultReference
SDLR
100 mg/kg food; reported average daily dose 7.9 ± 0.2 mg/kg/day
SD without resveratrol, n = 60No significant survival or maximum-lifespan increase.[4]
SDR
400 mg/kg food; reported average daily dose 30.9 ± 0.6 mg/kg/day
SD without resveratrol, n = 60No significant survival or maximum-lifespan increase.[4]
HCLR
100 mg/kg food; reported average daily dose 5.4 ± 0.2 mg/kg/day
HC without resveratrol, n = 55Remaining lifespan increased 26%; maximum lifespan increased.[4]
HCR
400 mg/kg food; reported average daily dose 24.2 ± 0.8 mg/kg/day
HC without resveratrol, n = 55Remaining lifespan increased 25%; maximum-lifespan increase nonsignificant.[4]
SDLR
Model: Standard diet; n = 55
Reported limits: Dose ± preserved as reported; statistic not identified in selected main methods. Supplement not retrieved.
SDR
Model: Standard diet; n = 54
Reported limits: Dose ± preserved as reported; statistic not identified in selected main methods. Supplement not retrieved.
HCLR
Model: High-calorie diet, 60% calories from fat; n = 55
Reported limits: Dose ± preserved as reported; statistic not identified in selected main methods. Supplement not retrieved.
HCR
Model: High-calorie diet, 60% calories from fat; n = 55
Reported limits: Dose ± preserved as reported; statistic not identified in selected main methods. Supplement not retrieved.
Methods and source locations

Compound reported in the paper: Resveratrol; Compound label in the paper: resveratrol

Reported resveratrol experiments; stereochemical purity and equivalence to A10785 are not established.

Results: study overview and Survival; Fig. 4B,D–E; Experimental Procedures: Animals and diets

Remaining lifespan on high-calorie diet: Survival section, reported from age one year; distinct log-rank P values in Fig. 4D: 0.004 and 0.03. Not total-lifespan percentage. — Results: study overview and Survival; Fig. 4B,D–E; Experimental Procedures: Animals and diets

Standard-diet survival and maximum lifespan: Fig. 4B,E; Kaplan–Meier curves not different by log-rank or Wilcoxon; n = 60 SD, 55 SDLR, 54 SDR. — Results: study overview and Survival; Fig. 4B,D–E; Experimental Procedures: Animals and diets

Maximum lifespan under high-calorie diet: Maximum lifespan defined as mean of final 20% surviving; Fig. 4E. — Results: study overview and Survival; Fig. 4B,D–E; Experimental Procedures: Animals and diets

SDLR · Results: study overview and Survival; Fig. 4B,D–E; Experimental Procedures: Animals and diets

SDR · Results: study overview and Survival; Fig. 4B,D–E; Experimental Procedures: Animals and diets

HCLR · Results: study overview and Survival; Fig. 4B,D–E; Experimental Procedures: Animals and diets

HCR · Results: study overview and Survival; Fig. 4B,D–E; Experimental Procedures: Animals and diets

Specifications

Manufacturer Adooq Bioscience
Actions Activator
CAS Number 501-36-0
Formula C14H12O3
Molecular Weight 228.2
SMILES
C1=CC(=CC=C1/C=C/C2=CC(=CC(=C2)O)O)O

Storage & Solubility

In Vitro Solubility

Reported Solubility

SolventReported Solubility
DMSO Warmed: 43 mg/mL (188.4 mM)
Water Insoluble
Ethanol Insoluble

Preparing Stock Solutions

Stock preparation is unavailable for this product molecular weight.

Calculated stock concentrations do not establish solvent solubility. Refer to the reported solubility data for experimental guidance.

In Vivo Preparation

Concentration
14 mg/mL
Vehicle
5% DMSO+30% PEG 300+ddH2O

Storage

Store powder at -20°C, keep desiccated.
In powder form, the chemical is stable for 36 months.
In solution, store at -20°C and use within 1 month to prevent loss of potency. Aliquot to avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Research References

  1. [1] Pacholec M, Bleasdale JE, Chrunyk B, et al. SRT1720, SRT2183, SRT1460, and resveratrol are not direct activators of SIRT1. The Journal of biological chemistry (2010). PMID: 20061378 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m109.088682 Source material
  2. [2] Lakshminarasimhan M, Rauh D, Schutkowski M, et al. Sirt1 activation by resveratrol is substrate sequence-selective. Aging (2013). PMID: 23524286 DOI: 10.18632/aging.100542 Source material
  3. [3] Tran HT, Liong S, Lim R, et al. Resveratrol ameliorates the chemical and microbial induction of inflammation and insulin resistance in human placenta, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. PloS one (2017). PMID: 28278187 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173373 Source material
  4. [4] Pearson KJ, Baur JA, Lewis KN, et al. Resveratrol delays age-related deterioration and mimics transcriptional aspects of dietary restriction without extending life span. Cell metabolism (2008). PMID: 18599363 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.06.011 Source material

Publications

4 publications citing this product

  1. Elif Azize Ozşahin Delibaş, .et al. , Metab Brain Dis, 2025, Aug 4;40(6):246 PMID: 40760225
  2. Zeynep Kasap Acungil, .et al. , Mol Neurobiol, 2024, Sep 24 PMID: 39316354
  3. Wafa Naji Shnaikat, .et al. , Iraqi J Pharm Sci, 2023, 31(Suppl.):92-99
  4. Ha T. Tran, .et al. , PLoS One, 2017, 12(3): e0173373 PMID: 28278187

Added to your cart

View Cart Checkout
Loading...