Concentration-dependent cell biotinylation and reporter attachment
Cell-based study · Murine C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cell line [1]
The concentration-response design assessed viability and avidin-mediated NanoLuc attachment. Labeling increased over the tested reporter-attachment range; the highest concentrations in the viability panel caused a modest significant reduction. These are labeling concentrations, not potency estimates.
| Endpoint | Reported result | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Cell viability following surface modification, measured 24 h after seeding | CCK-8 viability Hardly affected at 1000 μM or lower; significantly reduced at 5000 and 10000 μM (Figure 2A, *p < 0.05 versus control). | [1] |
| Cell-associated NanoLuc activity after avidin/biotin-NanoLuc attachment | RLU / 10^5 cells 1000 μM produced higher reporter attachment than 500 μM; exact bar heights were not extracted. | [1] |
Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions
- Treatment concentration
- Viability: 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000 or 10000 μM; reporter attachment: 50, 100, 500 or 1000 μM.
- Exposure duration
- Biotinylation: 10 min at room temperature; viability assessed 24 h after seeding surface-modified cells.
- Method
- Cell-surface biotinylation followed by washing and avidin-mediated reporter attachment.
- Vehicle
- HBSS
- Co-treatment
- Avidin 100 μg/mL for 5 min, followed by biotin-NanoLuc 100 μM for 5 min.
- Reported limits
- No analytical characterization of the sodium form or stereochemical purity. Exact viability percentages and reporter bar heights are not tabulated in the selected locations.
Methods and source locations
Compound reported in the paper: Sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin; Compound label in the paper: Pierce sulfosuccinimidyl-6-[biotin-amido]hexanoate
Research use of the named commercial reagent for cell biotinylation; no independent sodium-form comparison or Adooq validation.
Figure 2A–B and caption; Results: Optimisation of biotinylation of cells and of surface modification; Methods: Materials; Surface modification of cells by the ABC method
Cell viability following surface modification, measured 24 h after seeding: CCK-8; Figure 2 caption states experiments conducted in duplicate, representative experiment shown, results mean ± SD of three to four experiments. This replication wording is retained without reinterpretation. — Figure 2A and caption; Methods: Surface modification of cells by the ABC method
Cell-associated NanoLuc activity after avidin/biotin-NanoLuc attachment: Nano-Glo luciferase assay in lysed cells; concentration-dependent comparison in Figure 2B. Same caption replication wording as Figure 2A. — Figure 2B and caption; Results: Optimisation of biotinylation of cells and of surface modification; Methods: Surface modification of cells by the ABC method