Displacement of acetylated histone H4 from BRD4
Biochemical assay · Recombinant human BRD4 first and second bromodomains [1]
The active (+) enantiomer displaced acetylated histone H4 from both BRD4 bromodomains. The inactive enantiomer provided a stereochemical comparison; these assay-specific IC50 values are not cellular treatment concentrations.
Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions
- Method
- Bead-based luminescence proximity assay using tetra-acetylated histone H4; comparison with (−)-JQ1 and CREBBP. Recombinant protein expression is not a drug-treated cell model.
- Reported limits
- Detailed assay incubation and buffer conditions in supplementary methods were not retrieved for this batch.
Methods and source locations
Compound reported in the paper: (+)-JQ1
Evidence specifically concerns the (+) enantiomer, not (−)-JQ1 or a racemic product.
A selective and potent inhibitor for the BET sub-family of bromodomains; Figure 1e
BRD4 first bromodomain / acetylated H4 binding: ALPHA-screen peptide-displacement assay — Figure 1e and biochemical Results
BRD4 second bromodomain / acetylated H4 binding: ALPHA-screen peptide-displacement assay — Figure 1e and biochemical Results
Differentiation and cell-cycle responses in NMC 797 cells
Cell-based study · BRD4-NUT-dependent NMC 797 carcinoma cells [1]
(+)-JQ1 induced a squamous differentiation-associated expression pattern and G1 arrest. The matched (−) enantiomer did not reproduce these responses, supporting a stereospecific effect in this BRD4-NUT model.
Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions
- Treatment concentration
- 250 nM (+)-JQ1; separate comparator: 250 nM (−)-JQ1
- Exposure duration
- 48 h
- Method
- RT-PCR and flow cytometry with vehicle and inactive-enantiomer controls. Figure 4f reports mean ± s.d., n = 3; no precision beyond the stated 30-fold induction is inferred.
- Reported limits
- Vehicle composition for these particular panels is not specified in the reviewed main-text caption.
Methods and source locations
Compound reported in the paper: (+)-JQ1
Evidence specifically concerns (+)-JQ1 in this BRD4-NUT-dependent cell model.
Figure 4f,h and captions; JQ1 induces squamous differentiation and growth arrest in BRD4-dependent carcinoma
Keratin-14 expression: Quantitative RT-PCR relative to vehicle — Figure 4f; Results: JQ1 induces squamous differentiation
DNA-content distribution: Flow cytometry — Figure 4h and caption
MYC suppression in MM.1S myeloma cells
Cell-based study · Human MM.1S multiple myeloma cells [2]
The active JQ1 enantiomer reduced MYC transcript and c-Myc protein in MM.1S cells. The matched inactive enantiomer did not reproduce the protein response, linking this result to stereospecific BET inhibition rather than direct binding to c-Myc.
Literature-Reported Treatment Conditions
- Treatment concentration
- 500 nM (+)-JQ1; 500 nM (−)-JQ1 comparator in the protein experiment
- Exposure duration
- MYC qRT-PCR: 0, 0.5, 1, 4 and 8 h; protein comparison: 24 h
- Method
- qRT-PCR relative to baseline expression; c-Myc immunoblot with GAPDH loading control; vehicle and inactive-enantiomer comparators.
- Reported limits
- No exact fold reduction is inferred from the expression bars. Supplementary extended methods for this paper were not retrieved.
Methods and source locations
Compound reported in the paper: (+)-JQ1
Evidence is for the active (+) enantiomer; (−)-JQ1 is a separate comparator.
Downregulation of MYC; Figure 3B–C; Gene expression analysis
MYC transcript in MM.1S: qRT-PCR — Figure 3B
c-Myc protein in MM.1S: Immunoblotting — Figure 3C